Is there a way to force the “most vexing parse” to be an error, even on a class by class basis?

问题

Is it possible (with any modification of class A) to have the following work? i.e., make the most vexing parse an error?

class A {
};

int main() {
    A a(); // can this be forced to be an error??
    A b;   // this should work
}

回答1:

No modification of the class A will have any effect on how a declaration A a(); is parsed. The parser determines that this is a function declaration before it even bothers to look at the definition of A. In fact the definition of A doesn't even need to be visible to parse this statement; A forward declaration is sufficient.

However compilers generally have a warning for this and you can probably turn that into an error. For example with clang you can use the flag -Werror=vexing-parse.

struct A;

A a(); // no error

int main() {
    A a(); // error
}

clang++ -std=c++11 -Weverything -Werror=vexing-parse main.cpp

main.cpp:6:8: error: empty parentheses interpreted as a function declaration [-Werror,-Wvexing-parse]
    A a();
       ^~
main.cpp:6:8: note: replace parentheses with an initializer to declare a variable
    A a();
       ^~
       {}
1 error generated.

Although technically speaking A a(); isn't the syntax known as the most vexing parse. That would be:

A a(B());

回答2:

There is no way in the current language specification which could make this code an error. Normally, you just get a funny error message when you try to use the "object". However, some compilers do warn about the situation (e.g. clang):

clang++ -W -Wall  -Werror -c -o vexing.o vexing.cpp
vexing.cpp:5:8: error: empty parentheses interpreted as a function declaration [-Werror,-Wvexing-parse]
   A a(); // can this be forced to be an error??
      ^~

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19009306/is-there-a-way-to-force-the-most-vexing-parse-to-be-an-error-even-on-a-class

标签

c++

most-vexing-parse