问题
I am trying to adapt Brian's Fold for Bianary Trees (http://lorgonblog.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/catamorphisms-part-two/) to apply for Multiway trees.
Summarizing from Brian's Blog:
Data structure:
type Tree<'a> =
| Node of (*data*)'a * (*left*)Tree<'a> * (*right*)Tree<'a>
| Leaf
let tree7 = Node(4, Node(2, Node(1, Leaf, Leaf), Node(3, Leaf, Leaf)),
Node(6, Node(5, Leaf, Leaf), Node(7, Leaf, Leaf)))
Binary Tree Fold function
let FoldTree nodeF leafV tree =
let rec Loop t cont =
match t with
| Node(x,left,right) -> Loop left (fun lacc ->
Loop right (fun racc ->
cont (nodeF x lacc racc)))
| Leaf -> cont leafV
Loop tree (fun x -> x)
examples
let SumNodes = FoldTree (fun x l r -> x + l + r) 0 tree7
let Tree6to0 = FoldTree (fun x l r -> Node((if x=6 then 0 else x), l, r)) Leaf tree7
Multiway Tree version [not (fully) working]:
Data Structure
type MultiTree = | MNode of int * list<MultiTree>
let Mtree7 = MNode(4, [MNode(2, [MNode(1,[]); MNode(3, [])]);
MNode(6, [MNode(5, []); MNode(7, [])])])
Fold function
let MFoldTree nodeF leafV tree =
let rec Loop tree cont =
match tree with
| MNode(x,sub)::tail -> Loop (sub@tail) (fun acc -> cont(nodeF x acc))
| [] -> cont leafV
Loop [tree] (fun x -> x)
Example 1 Returns 28 - seems to work
let MSumNodes = MFoldTree (fun x acc -> x + acc) 0 Mtree7
Example 2
Doesn't Run
let MTree6to0 = MFoldTree (fun x acc -> MNode((if x=6 then 0 else x), [acc])) Mtree7
Initially I thought the MFoldTree
needed a map.something
somewhere but I got it to work with the @
operator instead.
Any help on the second example and or correcting what I've done in the MFoldTree
function would be great!
Cheers
dusiod
回答1:
Another solution could be
let rec mfold f a (MNode(x,s)) = f (List.fold (fun a t -> mfold f a t) a s) x
really, we can treat tree as a lineal struct (to fold it).
Use case
> mfold (+) 0 Mtree7;;
val it : int = 28
Filter is the same with normal fold (because mfold
is a normal fold):
> mfold (fun a x -> if x = 6 then a else x + a) 0 Mtree7;;
val it : int = 22
That function could be generic (as List.fold
, Array.fold
, ... could be generics).
"but the intention of the second is to return the whole tree modified so that any nodes which had the value 6 for example now have value 0"
But that is not a fold
computation, is a map
!
You can do easilly (treating, again, as a lineal struct)
let rec mmap f (MNode(x,s)) = MNode(f x, List.map (mmap f) s)
Use case
> mmap (fun x -> if x=6 then 0 else x) Mtree7;;
val it : MultiTree =
MNode
(4,
[MNode (2,[MNode (1,[]); MNode (3,[])]);
MNode (0,[MNode (5,[]); MNode (7,[])])])
Again, I suggest to do it for each possible list container (Seq
, List
, Array
, ...), it enable to user select best strategy in context.
Notes:
- I'm new in F#, excuse me if some is wrong.
- stack size should not be a problem, stack level is equal to tree's deep.
回答2:
The trick is that you need to pass one additional function to fold.
In Brian's version, the fold function just takes nodeF
that is called with the value in the node and the two values produced from the left and right sub-trees.
That is not sufficient for multiway trees. Here, we need a function nodeF
that is called with the value in the node and the result produced by aggregating all values of the sub-trees. But you also need a function - say combineF
that combines value produced from multiple sub-trees of a node.
Your fold function is a good start - you just need to add one more recursive call to process tail
:
let MFoldTree nodeF combineF leafV tree =
let rec Loop trees cont =
match trees with
| MNode(x,sub)::tail ->
// First, process the sub-trees of the current node and get
// a single value called 'accSub' representing (aggregated)
// folding of the sub-trees.
Loop sub (fun accSub ->
// Now we can call 'nodeF' on the current value & folded sub-tree
let resNode = nodeF x accSub
// But now we also need to fold all remaining trees that were
// passed to us in the parameter 'trees'..
Loop tail (fun accTail ->
// This produces a value 'accTail' and now we need to combine the
// result from the tail with the one for the first node
// (which is where we need 'combineF')
cont(combineF resNode accTail) ))
| [] -> cont leafV
Loop [tree] (fun x -> x)
Summing is easy, because we just use the +
operator for both functions:
let MSumNodes = MFoldTree (+) (+) 0 Mtree7
Filtering the tree is more tricky. The nodeF
function will get the element in the node and a list of child nodes (that is the result of aggregation) and produces a single node. The combineF
function will get the result from a first node (that is a MultiTree
value) and a list of children produced from the remaining nodes. The initial value produced from an empty tree is an empty list:
let MTree6to0 =
MFoldTree (fun x children -> MNode((if x=6 then 0 else x), children))
(fun head tail -> head::tail) [] Mtree7
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16875835/fold-recursion-over-multiway-tree-in-f