问题
Apparently the following function prototypes are valid in C99 and C11:
void foo(int a[const *]);
void bar(int a[static volatile 10]);
What is the purpose of those strange subscript notations *
, static
, and CV qualifiers?
Do they help distinguish statically typed arrays from variable-length arrays? Or are they just syntactic sugar?
回答1:
static in parameter array declarator
void f(int a[static 10]);
static
here is an indication that parameter a
is a pointer to int
but that the array objet (where a
is a pointer to its first element) has at least 10
elements.
A compiler has then the right to assume f
argument is not NULL
and therefore it could perform some optimizations. gcc
currently performs no optimization (source):
"The information provided by static in parameter array declarators is not used for optimization. It might make sense to use it in future in conjunction with work on prefetching."
qualifier in parameter array declarator
void g(int a[cvr 10]);
inside g
a
is a cvr pointer to int
(cvr is const
, volatile
or restrict
qualifier). For example, with const
it means a
is a const
pointer to int
(i.e., type int * const
).
So a parameter declaration:
T param[cvr e]
is the same as a parameter declaration:
T * cvr param
* in parameter array declarator
void h(int a[*]);
The [*]
in a formal array parameter declaration in a function declaration (that is not part of a function definition) indicates that the formal array is a variable length array.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17559631/what-are-those-strange-array-sizes-and-static-in-c99