问题
Will Backbone.Router.navigate
set test
to true
:
var test = false;
var Router = Backbone.Router.extend({
routes: {
'posts': 'showPosts'
},
showPosts: function () {
test = true;
}
});
router = new Router();
Backbone.history.start();
router.navigate('posts?foo=3', {trigger: true});
assert.ok(test);
Eg, will posts?foo=3
fragment will match the posts
route by default, or do I have to set another route for that, for example: posts?*querystring
?
Thank you
PS: I know there exist the backbone-query-parameters but I want to know just for backbone.
回答1:
You need to add another route with that expecting parameter :
routes: {
'posts?foo=:foo' : 'showPosts',
'posts': 'showPosts'
},
showPosts: function (foo) {
if(typeof foo != 'undefined'){
// foo parameters was passed
}
test = true;
}
update
You could define the general route to return all the query string and then parse it in the handler :
routes: {
'posts': 'showPosts',
'posts?*queryString' : 'showPosts'
},
showPosts: function (queryString) {
var params = parseQueryString(queryString);
if(params.foo){
// foo parameters was passed
}
}
...
// and the function that parses the query string can be something like :
function parseQueryString(queryString){
var params = {};
if(queryString){
_.each(
_.map(decodeURI(queryString).split(/&/g),function(el,i){
var aux = el.split('='), o = {};
if(aux.length >= 1){
var val = undefined;
if(aux.length == 2)
val = aux[1];
o[aux[0]] = val;
}
return o;
}),
function(o){
_.extend(params,o);
}
);
}
return params;
}
update 2
Here's a live demo to see the code in action.
回答2:
Just to complement the previous answers, instead of defining two routes that have the same callback, like:
routes: {
'posts': 'showPosts',
'posts?*querystring': 'showPosts'
}
You could have only one route to keep the code cleaner:
routes: {
'posts(?*querystring)': 'showPosts'
}
回答3:
Backbone docs:
Routes can contain parameter parts, :param, which match a single URL component between slashes; and splat parts *splat, which can match any number of URL components.
If you still want to keep the functionality without the matching you can define two routes
routes: {
'posts': 'showPosts',
'posts?*querystring': 'showPosts'
}
showPosts: function(querystring) {
if (querystring) {
// here you can parse your querystring, for your case the querystring variable is
// 'foo=3'
}
//here you'll show posts according to the querystring (or lack thereof)
}
回答4:
Here's another take, still using lodash (underscore). Removed the _.map, added a bit of verbosity to the variables, and stripped out the starting '?' if present:
function parseQueryString(queryString)
{
if (!_.isString(queryString))
return
queryString = queryString.substring( queryString.indexOf('?') + 1 )
var params = {}
var queryParts = decodeURI(queryString).split(/&/g)
_.each(queryParts, function(val)
{
var parts = val.split('=')
if (parts.length >= 1)
{
var val = undefined
if (parts.length == 2)
val = parts[1]
params[parts[0]] = val
}
})
return params
}
回答5:
RFC 3986 "syntax for URIs" states that query parameters shold come before hash fragment.
In URIs a hashmark # introduces the optional fragment near the end of the URL. The generic RFC 3986 syntax for URIs also allows an optional query part introduced by a question mark ?. In URIs with a query and a fragment, the fragment follows the query.
I have this issue handling a redirect I am getting from the server i.e. "http://foo.com/main.html?error=errormessage#site". I would like to route on the query but can't see a way to write the backbone route expression to handle this url. For now I just route on the hash and check for a query by parsing location.search.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11671400/navigate-route-with-querystring