问题
the 'expr' rule in the ANTLR grammar below obviously mutually left-recursive. As a ANTLR newbie it's difficult to get my head around solving this. I've read "Resolving Non-LL(*) Conflicts" in the ANTLR reference book, but I still don't see the solution. Any pointers?
LPAREN : ( '(' ) ; RPAREN : ( ')' ); AND : ( 'AND' | '&' | 'EN' ) ; OR : ( 'OR' | '|' | 'OF' ); NOT : ('-' | 'NOT' | 'NIET' ); WS : ( ' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n' ) {$channel=HIDDEN;} ; WORD : (~( ' ' | '\t' | '\r' | '\n' | '(' | ')' | '"' ))*; input : expr EOF; expr : (andexpr | orexpr | notexpr | atom); andexpr : expr AND expr; orexpr : expr OR expr; notexpr : NOT expr; phrase : '"' WORD* '"'; atom : (phrase | WORD);
回答1:
I would suggest to have a look at the example grammers on the antlr site. The java grammar does what you want.
Basicly you can do something like this:
expr : andexpr;
andexpr : orexpr (AND andexpr)*;
orexpr : notexpr (OR orexpr)*;
notexpr : atom | NOT expr;
The key is, that every expression can end to be an atom.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3556078/solving-antlr-mutually-left-recursive-rules