Html.Partial vs Html.RenderPartial & Html.Action vs Html.RenderAction

问题

In ASP.NET MVC, what is the difference between:

Html.Partial and Html.RenderPartial
Html.Action and Html.RenderAction

回答1:

Html.Partial returns a String. Html.RenderPartial calls Write internally and returns void.

The basic usage is:

// Razor syntax
@Html.Partial("ViewName")
@{ Html.RenderPartial("ViewName");  }

// WebView syntax
<%: Html.Partial("ViewName") %>
<% Html.RenderPartial("ViewName"); %>

In the snippet above, both calls will yield the same result.

While one can store the output of Html.Partial in a variable or return it from a method, one cannot do this with Html.RenderPartial. The result will be written to the Response stream during execution/evaluation.

This also applies to Html.Action and Html.RenderAction.

回答2:

Think of @Html.Partial as HTML code copied into the parent page. Think of @Html.RenderPartial as an .ascx user control incorporated into the parent page. An .ascx user control has far more overhead.

'@Html.Partial' returns a html encoded string that gets constructed inline with the parent. It accesses the parent's model.

'@Html.RenderPartial' returns the equivalent of a .ascx user control. It gets its own copy of the page's ViewDataDictionary and changes made to the RenderPartial's ViewData do not effect the parent's ViewData.

Using reflection we find:

public static MvcHtmlString Partial(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper, string partialViewName, object model, ViewDataDictionary viewData)
{
    MvcHtmlString mvcHtmlString;
    using (StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter(CultureInfo.CurrentCulture))
    {
        htmlHelper.RenderPartialInternal(partialViewName, viewData, model, stringWriter, ViewEngines.Engines);
        mvcHtmlString = MvcHtmlString.Create(stringWriter.ToString());
    }
    return mvcHtmlString;
}

public static void RenderPartial(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper, string partialViewName)
{
    htmlHelper.RenderPartialInternal(partialViewName, htmlHelper.ViewData, null, htmlHelper.ViewContext.Writer, ViewEngines.Engines);
}

回答3:

Difference is first one returns an MvcHtmlString but second (Render..) outputs straight to the response.

回答4:

Here is what I have found:

Use RenderAction when you do not have a model to send to the view and have a lot of html to bring back that doesn't need to be stored in a variable.

Use Action when you do not have a model to send to the view and have a little bit of text to bring back that needs to be stored in a variable.

Use RenderPartial when you have a model to send to the view and there will be a lot of html that doesn't need to be stored in a variable.

Use Partial when you have a model to send to the view and there will be a little bit of text that needs to be stored in a variable.

RenderAction and RenderPartial are faster.

回答5:

According to me @Html.RenderPartial() has faster execution than @Html.Partial() due to Html.RenderPartial gives a quick response to Output.

Because when I use @Html.Partial(), my website takes more time to load compared to @Html.RenderPartial()

回答6:

@Html.Partial and @Html.RenderPartial are used when your Partial view model is correspondence of parent model, we don't need to create any action method to call this.

@Html.Action and @Html.RenderAction are used when your partial view model are independent from parent model, basically it is used when you want to display any widget type content on page. You must create an action method which returns a partial view result while calling the method from view.

回答7:

回答8:

The return type of Html.RenderAction is void that means it directly renders the responses in View where the return type of Html.Action is MvcHtmlString You can catch its render view in controller and modify it by using following method

protected string RenderPartialViewToString(string viewName, object model)
    {
        if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(viewName))
            viewName = ControllerContext.RouteData.GetRequiredString("action");

        ViewData.Model = model;

        using (StringWriter sw = new StringWriter())
        {
            ViewEngineResult viewResult = ViewEngines.Engines.FindPartialView(ControllerContext, viewName);
            ViewContext viewContext = new ViewContext(ControllerContext, viewResult.View, ViewData, TempData, sw);
            viewResult.View.Render(viewContext, sw);
            return sw.GetStringBuilder().ToString();
        }
    }

This will return the Html string of the View.

This is also applicable to Html.Partial and Html.RenderPartial

回答9:

Partial or RenderPartial: No need to create action method. use when data to be display on the partial view is already present in model of current page.

Action or RenderAction: Requires child action method. use when data to display on the view has independent model.

回答10:

Differences:

The return type of RenderPartial is void, where as Partial returns MvcHtmlString
Syntax for invoking Partial() and RenderPartial() methods in Razor views

@Html.Partial("PartialViewName")
@{ Html.RenderPartial("PartialViewName"); }
Syntax for invoking Partial() and RenderPartial() methods in webform views

[%: Html.Partial("PartialViewName") %]
[% Html.RenderPartial("PartialViewName"); %]

The following are the 2 common interview questions related to Partial() and RenderPartial() When would you use Partial() over RenderPartial() and vice versa?

The main difference is that RenderPartial() returns void and the output will be written directly to the output stream, where as the Partial() method returns MvcHtmlString, which can be assigned to a variable and manipulate it if required. So, when there is a need to assign the output to a variable for manipulating it, then use Partial(), else use RenderPartial().

Which one is better for performance?

From a performance perspective, rendering directly to the output stream is better. RenderPartial() does exactly the same thing and is better for performance over Partial().

回答11:

Html.Partial: returns MvcHtmlString and slow

Html.RenderPartial: directly render/write on output stream and returns void and it's very fast in comparison to Html.Partial

回答12:

For "partial" I always use it as follows:

If there's something you need to include in a page that you need to go via the controller (like you would with an Ajax call) then use "Html.RenderPartial".

If you have a 'static' include that isn't linked to a controller per-se and just in the 'shared' folder for example, use "HTML.partial"

回答13:

@Html.Partial returns view in HTML-encoded string and use same view TextWriter object. @Html.RenderPartial this method return void. @Html.RenderPartial is faster than @Html.Partial

The syntax for PartialView:

 [HttpGet] 
 public ActionResult AnyActionMethod
 {
     return PartialView();
 }

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5248183/html-partial-vs-html-renderpartial-html-action-vs-html-renderaction

标签

.net

asp.net-mvc

partial-views

renderpartial

renderaction