问题
So I have a set of pairs<string ,string>
And I want to use find()
to search for a single string which would be in the "first" of the pair, then if I find that string in first I want to return second from that function.
My current attempt is..
myList::iterator i;
i = theList.find(make_pair(realName, "*"));
return i->second;
回答1:
Is C++11 acceptable?
auto it = find_if(theList.begin(), theList.end(),
[&](const pair<string, string>& val) -> bool {
return val.first == realName;
});
return it->second;
Or in C++03, first define a functor:
struct MatchFirst
{
MatchFirst(const string& realName) : realName(realName) {}
bool operator()(const pair<string, string>& val) {
return val.first == realName;
}
const string& realName;
};
then call it like so:
myList::iterator it = find_if(a.begin(), a.end(), MatchFirst(realName));
return it->second;
This will only return the first match, but from your question, it looks like that's all you're expecting.
回答2:
You can use std::set<std::pair<std::string, std::string> >
for this but you will need a custom
comparison object for this because the pair's relational operator takes both elements for this. That said, it seems as if you actually should use a std::map<std::string, std::string>
instead.
回答3:
The definition of <
for std::pair
implements a lexicographical order and ""
is the minimum element for strings. Combining this we get:
typedef std::pair<std::string, std::string> StringPair;
typedef std::set<StringPair> Set;
std::string const* find_first(Set const& s, std::string const& key) {
Set::const_iterator const it = s.lower_bound(std::make_pair(key, ""));
// Check that it actually points to a valid element whose key is of interest.
if (it == s.end() or it->first != key) { return 0; }
// Yata!
return &it->second;
}
The trick is using lower_bound
appropriately.
Returns an iterator pointing to the first element which does not compare less than
value
.
- If it returns
end()
, then it did not find anything interesting. - Otherwise,
it->first >= key
so we get rid of the>
case (of no interest to us)
I would point out though that this only returns the first element of the range. If you are interested in all elements, try:
typedef std::pair<Set::const_iterator, Set::const_iterator> SetItPair;
SetItPair equal_range_first(Set const& s, std::string const& key) {
StringPair const p = std::make_pair(key, "");
return std::make_pair(s.lower_bound(p), s.upper_bound(p));
}
This will return the full range of nodes in s
whose first element is equal to key
. You then just have to iterate over this range:
for (Set::const_iterator it = range.first; it != range.second; ++it) {
// do something
}
And you don't even have to worry whether the return of lower_bound
or upper_bound
was end or not.
- if
lower_bound
returnsend()
, then so doesupper_bound
, and the loop is skipped - if
lower_bound
points to a node for whichit->first > key
, thenupper_bound
will point to that same node, and the loop is skipped
That is the power of ranges: no need to make special checks, the ranges just end up empty when there is no match, and so the loop over them... is skipped in a single check.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9843278/c-set-search-for-pair-element