问题
We are splitting a big svn repository (100k+ revs) into several smaller repos. I am using svndumpfilter (v1.7.2) to split the dump and svndumptool/sed to filter the big dump.
Everything works fine, except that there are still some "padding revisions" in my filtered dump, even though I used the option "drop-empty-revs".
This is not too problematic when we have less than 10% of useless "padding revisions" but sometimes, the new repo has only a few hundreds real revisions that are buried in 30k+ "padding revisions".
Here is the command I use and the revisions that are included
svndumpfilter --drop-empty-revs --renumber-revs include /MyProj < MassiveOldRepo.dump > NewAllCleanRepo.dump
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3453 | (no author) | 2005-09-29 17:27:54 +0200 (jeu., 29 sept. 2005) | 1 line
This is an empty revision for padding.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r3454 | (no author) | 2005-09-29 17:28:27 +0200 (jeu., 29 sept. 2005) | 1 line
This is an empty revision for padding.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to know if there is a way not to include these revisions as I am filtering the dump (without manually removing them from the filtered dump).
EDIT: I would add that my use of svndumpfilter drops some empty revisions, the ones before the first "real" revision and the ones after the last "real" revision.
回答1:
I had the same problem with empty revisions being already included in the repository. Since Subversion 1.7 there is a still undocumented switch which allows to filter all empty revisions.
svndumpfilter --drop-all-empty-revs include / < oldrepos.dump > newrepos.dump
More information can be found at grokbase.
回答2:
After hours of tests, reading the svndumpfilter source code (which is very well commented, well done!), I realize that these empty revisions don't come from my filtering.
They are already lying in my original dump and date from 2005.
Conclusion : Check your data first!!
回答3:
I can't be sure about your situation, but in my case, it WAS the filtering that caused thousands of those padding messages to show up in the log. I resolved it by including these two switches:
--drop-empty-revs --renumber-revs
The second switch makes it so that if your filter, for example, included rev 1000-1200, but then excluded 1201-5000, the next rev it includes will be numbered 1201, not 5001 which would cause the creation of few thousand empty padding revs.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9791317/svndumpfilter-drop-empty-revs-keeps-padding-revision