I have a program that is being symlinked to multiple directories e.g.
/main/foo.pl
/run1/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
/run2/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
/run3/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
/run4/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
They're being run as cron jobs, hence I have the following entries in the crontab:
*/2 * * * * /run1/foo.pl
*/2 * * * * /run2/foo.pl
*/2 * * * * /run3/foo.pl
*/2 * * * * /run4/foo.pl
A snippet of foo.pl is as below:
use Fcntl qw(:flock);
use autodie qw(:all);
open my $self, '>', "$FindBin::Bin/lockme";
flock( $self, LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB )
or die "Cannot acquire lock, already running!";
{
my $long_proc = Process->new();
$long_proc->run();
}
You get the idea, each of the cron process can only run once because there is a lock semaphore check. But run1, run2, run3, and run4 can run simultaneously.
Now what I need is that I want to limit the number of process to maximum of four. If someone adds another cron processes like:
New symlinks:
/run5/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
/run6/foo.pl -> /main/foo.pl
Additional crontab:
*/5 * * * * /run5/foo.pl
* * * * * /run6/foo.pl
Both run5 and run6 need to be queued whenever run1, run2, run3, and run4 are all still running. Thus at any given time there will be only 4 processes run.
How can I achieve that? Is there any CPAN module that handles it?
Thanks!
You have a few general approaches:
Quick and Dirty
Have a directory with N lockfiles, and have each process try to lock each file in turn, sleeping a bit.
Caveat: It's a busy loop, yes, but it might be good enough.
Daemonic Redesign
Turn foo.pl
into a local socket-listening daemon, as it is easy for a parent process to manage concurrency of its children. Turn your cron jobs into blocking requests for the daemon to so something. (See, e.g., Parallel::ForkManager).
Caveat: You'll have to carefully re-implement setuid/privilege changing code if you were using cron to run foo.pl
as multiple different users.
Interprocess Semaphores, SysV
IPC::Semaphore is a somewhat more convenient interface to the SysV semget
family of functions in perlfunc
, and the SEM_UNDO flag means that the unexpected process death of one of your workers won't "waste" a semaphore increment.
Caveat: You'll likely need to create and initialize the SysV semaphore in a separate process, distinct from foo.pl
, since you cannot create and initialize a SysV semaphore in an atomic operation.
Interprocess Semaphores, POSIXly
POSIX::RT::Semaphore also supports interprocess semaphores. The API is simpler than SysV, and semaphores can be exclusively created and initialized to a value in an atomic syscall.
This is probably what I'd use.
Please see comment from @tsee in @pilcrow answer above. Steffen Muller's IPC::ConcurrencyLimit can control the number of concurrenct processes on cooperative multi processing nicely.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14639181/in-perl-5-how-to-queue-a-process-application-after-it-reaches-a-maximum-limit