JavaScript Array Iteration returning more than values

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-12-06 12:11:42

The for enumeration is going to go over every member of the object you passed it. In this case an array, which happens to have functions as members as well as the elements passed.

You could re-write your for loop to check if typeof stypes[t] == "function" or yada yada. But IMO you are better off just modifying your looping to only elements..

for(var i = 0, t; t = stypes[i]; ++i){
    if (t != x) {
        alert(t);
    }
}

Or

for(var i = 0; i < stypes.length; ++i){
    if (stypes[i] != x) {
        alert(stypes[i]);
    }
}

I wanted to migrate my last comment up to the answer to add the notice of the a caveat for the first type of loop.

from Simon Willison's "A re-introduction to JavaScript"..

for (var i = 0, item; item = a[i]; i++) {
    // Do something with item
}

Here we are setting up two variables. The assignment in the middle part of the for loop is also tested for truthfulness - if it succeeds, the loop continues. Since i is incremented each time, items from the array will be assigned to item in sequential order. The loop stops when a "falsy" item is found (such as undefined).

Note that this trick should only be used for arrays which you know do not contain "falsy" values (arrays of objects or DOM nodes for example). If you are iterating over numeric data that might include a 0 or string data that might include the empty string you should use the i, j idiom instead.

you want to do:

for (var i in object) {
    if (!object.hasOwnProperty(i))
        continue;
    ... do stuff ...
}

As for..in enumeration iterates over all properties (enumerable or otherwise) that exist on both the object and its prototype chain. The hasOwnProperty check restricts iteration to just those properties on the actual object you want to enumerate.

ES5 makes things a little better for library developers (and help avoid this stuff) but we won't see that ina shipping browser for quite a while :-(

[edit: replacing return with continue. lalalalala ;) ]

Since prototype has extended the array for your convenience you should take advantage of it. Your example could be rewritten as:

var x = 'shrimp';    
var stypes = new Array('shrimp', 'crabs', 'oysters', 'fin_fish', 'crawfish', 'alligator');
stypes.without(x).each(alert);

It should be

for (t in stypes) {
    if (t != x) {
        alert(t);
    }
}
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!