问题
the current Ecto documentation http://hexdocs.pm/ecto/Ecto.Schema.html only explains how to build a belongs_to
type of polymorphic association, when the polymorphic Comment
can belong to both Task
and Post
. But what about opposite direction?
For example there is a Listing
which can have a one of the four types of properties: Room
, Apartment
, Vila
or Office
.
Considering a one-to-one relationship, given the example above it would mean that there should be rooms_listings
, apartments_listings
, vila_listings
and office_listings
, which is impossible, because that will lead to the duplication of all of the other tables associated with listings
.
The question is how to model this kind of relationship?
回答1:
I think the simplest way to model this is by flipping around the sides of the association and then just adding the room_id
, etc. fields to the listings
table:
defmodule Listing do
use Ecto.Model
schema "listings" do
belongs_to :room, Room
belongs_to :apartment, Apartment
belongs_to :villa, Villa
belongs_to :office, Office
end
end
Then you can define a has_one :listing
relationship on every one of the other tables:
defmodule Room do
use Ecto.Model
schema "rooms" do
has_one :listing, Listing
end
end
defmodule Apartment do
use Ecto.Model
schema "apartments" do
has_one :listing, Listing
end
end
defmodule Villa do
use Ecto.Model
schema "villas" do
has_one :listing, Listing
end
end
defmodule Office do
use Ecto.Model
schema "offices" do
has_one :listing, Listing
end
end
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33184593/inverse-polymorphic-with-ecto