When you are writing slightly more complex functions I notice that $
is used a lot but I don't have a clue what it does?
$
is infix "application". It's defined as
($) :: (a -> b) -> (a -> b)
f $ x = f x
-- or
($) f x = f x
-- or
($) = id
It's useful for avoiding extra parentheses: f (g x) == f $ g x
.
A particularly useful location for it is for a "trailing lambda body" like
forM_ [1..10] $ \i -> do
l <- readLine
replicateM_ i $ print l
compared to
forM_ [1..10] (\i -> do
l <- readLine
replicateM_ i (print l)
)
Or, trickily, it shows up sectioned sometimes when expressing "apply this argument to whatever function"
applyArg :: a -> (a -> b) -> b
applyArg x = ($ x)
>>> map ($ 10) [(+1), (+2), (+3)]
[11, 12, 13]
I like to think of the $ sign as a replacement for parenthesis.
For example, the following expression:
take 1 $ filter even [1..10]
-- = [2]
What happens if we don't put the $? Then we would get
take 1 filter even [1..10]
and the compiler would now complain, because it would think we're trying to apply 4 arguments to the take
function, with the arguments being 1 :: Int
, filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]
, even :: Integral a => a -> Bool
, [1..10] :: [Int]
.
This is obviously incorrect. So what can we do instead? Well, we could put parenthesis around our expression:
(take 1) (filter even [1..10])
This would now reduce to:
(take 1) ([2,4,6,8,10])
which then becomes:
take 1 [2,4,6,8,10]
But we don't always want to be writing parenthesis, especially when functions start getting nested in each other. An alternative is to place the $
sign between where the pair of parenthesis would go, which in this case would be:
take 1 $ filter even [1..10]
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19521246/what-does-mean-do-in-haskell