I don't know how I didn't notice this, but data constructors and function definitions alike can't use types with kinds other than *
and it's variants * -> *
etc., due to (->)
's kind signature, even under -XPolyKinds
.
Here is the code I have tried:
{-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-}
{-# LANGUAGE KindSignatures #-}
data Nat = S Nat | Z
data Foo where
Foo :: 'Z -> Foo -- Fails
foo :: 'Z -> Int -- Fails
foo _ = 1
The error I'm getting is the following:
<interactive>:8:12:
Expected a type, but ‘Z’ has kind ‘Nat’
In the type signature for ‘foo’: foo :: 'Z -> Int
Why shouldn't we allow pattern matching with non-traditional kinds?
There is no1 such thing as "types with kinds other than *
". Kind *
is the kind for types, much like Int
is the type for machine-sized numbers; other kinds may contain stuff that resembles types or can be converted to types or is used to index types or whatever – but is not types as such, merely "type level entities".
1As usually, I disregard unbox-kinds here.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27924699/unusual-kinds-and-data-constructors