NSubstitute - Received for async - “call is not awaited”warning

谁说胖子不能爱 提交于 2019-12-05 09:27:18

问题


I am trying to verify that an asynchronous method was called with the correct parameters. However, I get the warning:

"Because this call is not awaited, execution of the current method continues before the call is completed. Consider applying the 'await' operator to the result of the call". This warning appears on the line of code underneath the //Assert comment (below).

My test using NSubstitute is as follows:

[Test]
public async Task SimpleTests()
{
  //Arrange
  var request = CreateUpdateItemRequest();

  databaseHelperSub.ExecuteProcAsync(Arg.Any<DatabaseParams>()).Returns(Task.FromResult((object)null));

  //Act      
  await underTest.ExecuteAsync(request);

  //Assert
  databaseHelperSub.Received().ExecuteProcAsync(Arg.Is<DatabaseParams>(
    p => p.StoredProcName == StoredProcedureName
         && p.Parameters[0].ParameterName == "Param1"
         && p.Parameters[0].Value.ToString() == "Value1"
         && p.Parameters[1].ParameterName == "Param2"
         && p.Parameters[1].Value.ToString() == "Value2"));
}

The unit under test method underTest.ExecuteAsync(request) calls ExecuteProcedureAsync and performs the await:

var ds = await DatabaseHelper.ExecuteProcAsync(dbParams);

Due to the fact that with NSubstitute, the Received() is required after the execution of the unit under test. Whereas in RhinoMocks, you can expect for a call to occur before the unit under test is executed. RhinoMocks can return the Task.FromResult() whereas NSubstitute cannot.

The RhinoMocks equivalent that works is this:

[Test]
        public async Task SimpleTest()
        {
            // Arrange
            var request = new UpdateItemRequest();

            databaseHelperMock.Expect(m => m.ExecuteProcAsync(Arg<DatabaseParams>.Matches(
                p =>   p.StoredProcName == StoredProcedureName
                    && p.Parameters[0].ParameterName == "Param1"
                    && p.Parameters[0].Value.ToString() == "Value1"
                    && p.Parameters[1].ParameterName == "Param2"
                    && p.Parameters[1].Value.ToString() == "Value2
                ))).Return(Task.FromResult<object>(null));

            // Act
            await underTest.ExecuteAsync(request);

        }

I have seen that there is a workaround where you can add an extension method to remove the issue:

  public static class TestHelper
  {
    public static void IgnoreAwait(this Task task)
    {

    }
  }

Meaning my test line for NSubstitute can be executed as follows and the warning goes away:

databaseHelperSub.Received().ExecuteProcAsync(Arg.Is<DatabaseParams>(
        p => p.StoredProcName == StoredProcedureName
             && p.Parameters[0].ParameterName == "Param1"
             && p.Parameters[0].Value.ToString() == "Value1"
             && p.Parameters[1].ParameterName == "Param2"
             && p.Parameters[1].Value.ToString() == "Value2")).IgnoreAwait();
    }

However, I assumed there must be a better solution out there for this?


回答1:


As soon as you update to version 1.9.0 or higher, you'll be able to use the await without receiving a NullReferenceException.




回答2:


Whenever the Received() predicate gets too complicated or just won't match with NSubstitute you can always capture the specified args using callbacks via When().Do() or .AndDoes(). For your use case that would go something like this

DatabaseParams receivedParms = null;
databaseHelperSub.ExecuteProcAsync(Arg.Any<DatabaseParams>())
  .Returns(Task.FromResult((object)null))
  .AndDoes(x => receivedParms = x.Arg<DatabaseParams>);

//Act      
await underTest.ExecuteAsync(request);

//Assert
receivedParms.Should().NotBeNull();
// assert your parms...



回答3:


The Jake Ginnivan answer explains that for Received await is not required, however compiler doesn’t understand it.

You can safely suppress the warning

 #pragma warning disable 4014 //for .Received await is not required, so suppress warning “Consider applying the 'await' operator”
   _service.Received(totalNumber).MyMethod(Arg.Any<ParamType>());
 #pragma warning restore 4014


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31318594/nsubstitute-received-for-async-call-is-not-awaited-warning

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!