I am using this DateTimeFormatter:
DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("ddMMYY")
I want to parse the string 150790
and I got this error:
Unable to obtain LocalDate from TemporalAccessor: {DayOfMonth=15, MonthOfYear=7, WeekBasedYear[WeekFields[MONDAY,4]]=2090},ISO of type java.time.format.Parsed
Obviously, I want to get the following TemporalAccessor
:
{DayOfMonth=15, MonthOfYear=7, WeekBasedYear=1990}
Do you know why I got the year 2090 instead of 1990?
Thanks for your help
Since this question is really about new java.time
-package and NOT SimpleDateFormat
I will cite following relevant section:
Year: The count of letters determines the minimum field width below which padding is used. If the count of letters is two, then a reduced two digit form is used. For printing, this outputs the rightmost two digits. For parsing, this will parse using the base value of 2000, resulting in a year within the range 2000 to 2099 inclusive.
We see that Java-8 uses the range 2000-2099 per default, not like SimpleDateFormat
the range -80 years until +20 years relative to today.
If you want to configure it then you have to use appendValueReduced(). This is designed in an inconvenient way, but possible, see here:
String s = "150790";
// old code with base range 2000-2099
DateTimeFormatter dtf1 =
new DateTimeFormatterBuilder().appendPattern("ddMMyy").toFormatter();
System.out.println(dtf1.parse(s)); // 2090-07-15
// improved code with base range 1935-2034
DateTimeFormatter dtf2 =
new DateTimeFormatterBuilder().appendPattern("ddMM")
.appendValueReduced(
ChronoField.YEAR, 2, 2, Year.now().getValue() - 80
).toFormatter();
System.out.println(dtf2.parse(s)); // 1990-07-15
By the way, if you really want week-based years then you have to use Y instead of y or the appropriate field IsoFields.WEEK_BASED_YEAR
. Regarding the fact that you don't have any other week-related fields I would assume the normal calendar year, not the week-based one.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29490893/parsing-string-to-local-date-doesnt-use-desired-century