I'm still trying to get a hang of the parallels between arrow notation and the semantics of the Arrow typeclasses defined in Haskell. In particular, this question seems to have a very canonical example of a small counter written with arrow notation:
counter :: ArrowCircuit a => a Bool Int
counter = proc reset -> do
rec output <- returnA -< if reset then 0 else next
next <- delay 0 -< output+1
returnA -< output
Can someone show me how to convert this back into Haskell2010 without arrow notation?
{- |
+---------+
>Bool>--------------> |
| >------------------>Int>
+---------+ | arr f |
/----> delay 0 >---> >---------\
| +---------+ | | |
| +---------+ |
| |
\--------------------------------------/
-}
counter' :: ArrowCircuit a => a Bool Int
counter' = loop $ second (delay 0) >>> arr f
where
f (reset, next) = let output = if reset then 0 else next
next' = output + 1
in (output, next')
The recursive rec
part is implemented using loop
. The inner part that converts reset
to output
using next
(and producing new next
value) is just a pure function with two inputs and two outputs.
A parallellism in functional code, would be to use a state op. in a fold
import Data.List
counter :: (Int, Int) -> Bool -> (Int, Int)
counter (_, previous_next) reset =
let output = if reset then 0 else previous_next
next = output +1
in (output, next)
runCounter :: [Bool] -> (Int, Int)
runCounter = foldl' counter (0,1)
main = do
let resets = [True, False, True, False, False]
result = fst $ runCounter resets
print result
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25256138/convert-from-arrow-notation