问题
Currently trying to write a select statement with a containstable
and the search condition is giving me some grief.
The purpose is to search a table with 3 different parameter types and rank the output accordingly. (below is sample of my code)
- Key search condition (must-have and weighted at 1)
|| testvalue = Accountant
- Additional must-have (weighted .8)
|| testvalue = Manager
- Nice to have (weighted .5)
|| testvalue = Excel
SQL:
SELECT KTBL.Rank as [Ranking], KeySkills
FROM Applicants INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(Applicants, KeySkills,
'(ISABOUT("Accountant" weight(1))) &
(ISABOUT("Manager" weight(.8))) |
(ISABOUT("Excel") weight(.5)))
AS KTBL
ON Applicants.Id = KTBL.[KEY];
The above statement does not return anything and I'm doubting whether its possible to stack isabout terms in the above manner.
The returned results must have both accountant AND manager and would be nice to have Excel
Any suggestions to have I can achieve this?
回答1:
I eventually came up with a solution to my own question that I'm happy with for the time being.
I ended up with the stored procedure as seen below here (a bit long winded) which takes 3 parameters 1. Primary Search Key (must match) 2. Additional Must Have comma separated string (must match) 3. Additional Nice to have comma separated string
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetJobSeekers]
(
@KeywordSearch nvarchar(500),
@MustHave nvarchar(500), --Comma separated skills
@NiceToHave nvarchar(500) --Comma separated skills
)
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @SQL nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @SELECT nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @SEARCH nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @SEARCH1 nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @SEARCH2 nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @WHERE nvarchar(4000)
DECLARE @ORDERBY nvarchar(4000)
/*Used for string split*/
DECLARE @POS int
DECLARE @NEXTPOS int
/*Get Result for primary search key*/
SET @SELECT = 'SELECT ktbl.rank AS [Ranking], jobseekers.*'
SET @SEARCH = 'ISABOUT("'+@KeywordSearch+'" weight(1))'
SET @WHERE = ' FROM jobseekers INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE (jobseekers, *, ''' + @SEARCH + ''')
AS ktbl On jobseekers.Id = ktbl.[KEY]'
SET @ORDERBY= 'ORDER BY [Ranking] DESC'
/* Get Result set for all additional must have keywords and INNER JOIN With primary Search */
IF @MustHave <> ''
BEGIN
DECLARE @MustHaveSplitString nvarchar(500)
SET @POS = 1
WHILE(@POS <= LEN(@MustHave))
BEGIN
SELECT @NEXTPOS = CHARINDEX(N',', @MustHave, @POS)
IF (@NEXTPOS = 0 OR @NEXTPOS IS NULL)
SELECT @NEXTPOS = LEN(@MustHave) + 1
SELECT @MustHaveSplitString = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@MustHave, @POS, @NEXTPOS - @POS)))
SET @SELECT = @SELECT + ', ktbl'+@MustHaveSplitString+'.rank AS [Ranking'+@MustHaveSplitString+']'
SET @ORDERBY = @ORDERBY + ', [Ranking'+@MustHaveSplitString+'] DESC'
SET @SEARCH1 = 'ISABOUT("'+@MustHaveSplitString+'" weight(.8))'
SET @WHERE = @WHERE + ' INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE (jobseekers, *, ''' + @SEARCH1 + ''')
AS ktbl'+@MustHaveSplitString+' on Jobseekers.Id = ktbl'+@MustHaveSplitString+'.[KEY]'
SELECT @POS = @NEXTPOS+1
END
END
/*Get result set for all nice to have by stacking them in the isabout searchcondition and LEFT OUTER JOIN with Primary Search + Must have search if its there*/
IF @NiceToHave <> ''
BEGIN
DECLARE @NiceToHaveSplitString nvarchar(500)
SET @SEARCH2 = 'ISABOUT('
SET @POS = 1
WHILE(@POS <= LEN(@NiceToHave))
BEGIN
SELECT @NEXTPOS = CHARINDEX(N',', @NiceToHave, @POS)
IF (@NEXTPOS = 0 OR @NEXTPOS IS NULL)
SELECT @NEXTPOS = LEN(@NiceToHave) + 1
SELECT @NiceToHaveSplitString = RTRIM(LTRIM(SUBSTRING(@NiceToHave, @POS, @NEXTPOS - @POS)))
SET @SEARCH2 = @SEARCH2 + '"'+@NiceToHaveSplitString+'" weight(.5),'
SELECT @POS = @NEXTPOS+1
END
/*Clean last , off the search2 string */
SET @SEARCH2 = LEFT(@SEARCH2, LEN(@SEARCH2) -1)
/*Close the isabout in search2 string*/
SET @SEARCH2 = @SEARCH2 + ')'
SET @SELECT = @SELECT + ', ktbl2.rank AS [Ranking2]'
SET @ORDERBY = @ORDERBY + ', [Ranking2] DESC'
SET @WHERE = @WHERE + ' LEFT JOIN CONTAINSTABLE (jobseekers, *, ''' + @SEARCH2 + ''')
AS ktbl2 on Jobseekers.Id = ktbl2.[KEY]'
END
SET @SQL = @SELECT + @WHERE + @ORDERBY
EXEC sp_executesql @SQL
END
The stored procedure is still not 100% complete as it needs to take additional logic into consideration but it will for the time being act as a shell for the end result. Also I have yet to test this against any substantial amount of data so I'm still unsure how well it will perform.
Kind regards,
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8415303/how-to-write-containstable-searchcondition-with-ands-and-ors