I'm testing the use of git-subtree to merge a library repo into a bigger project. It seems great in principle. Sometimes when I do a "git subtree pull" I get merge conflicts like this:
<<<<<<< HEAD
=======
An inserted line from the lib repo
>>>>>>> 4d348903449ebb584ab224cb34c6038fbf6b352d
That's for a change that was made in the library repo, merging into a file that has not been modified locally. Or another example, where I added a line in the local project repo, but in a file that is part of the subtree being merged:
<<<<<<< HEAD
Another inserted line
=======
>>>>>>> 4d348903449ebb584ab224cb34c6038fbf6b352d
Why would git report these as merge conflicts, but the region reported as the conflict is empty? Any way to prevent it?
These are easy enough to resolve, but it messes up the git-subtree workflow
It's not a solution to your root problem, but rather a mitigation of it. you can usegit merge -Xignore-space-change
to ignore space changes in your commits.
It's probably a problem with your line endings. you can try a --dry-run
alternative in merge (git merge
does not have --dry-run
option):
$git merge -Xignore-space-change --no-commit --no-ff $BRANCH
to see the changes before you actually commit them.
Use submodules to hold shared work. There is git-slave if you do a lot of work with shared and non-shared projects that need to be coordinated. Your line ending storage disparity will disappear.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8672095/git-reports-merge-conflict-with-no-changes-empty-lines-using-git-subtree