This post is a follow-up of this answered question: Best method for storing a list of user IDs.
I took cletus and Mehrdad Afshari's epic advice of using a normalized database approach. Are the following tables properly set up for proper optimization? I'm kind of new to MySQL efficiency, so I want to make sure this is effective.
Also, when it comes to finding the average rating for a game and the total number of votes should I use the following two queries, respectively?
SELECT avg(vote) FROM votes WHERE uid = $uid AND gid = $gid;
SELECT count(uid) FROM votes WHERE uid = $uid AND gid = $gid;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `games` (
`id` int(8) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`title` varchar(50) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `users` (
`id` int(8) NOT NULL auto_increment,
`username` varchar(20) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) AUTO_INCREMENT=1 ;
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `votes` (
`uid` int(8) NOT NULL,
`gid` int(8) NOT NULL,
`vote` int(1) NOT NULL,
KEY `uid` (`uid`,`gid`)
) ;
average votes for a game: SELECT avg(vote) FROM votes WHERE gid = $gid;
number of votes for a game: SELECT count(uid) FROM votes WHERE gid = $gid;
As you will not have any user or game ids smaller then 0
you could make them unsigned integers (int(8) unsigned NOT NULL
).
If you want to enforce that a user can only make a single vote for a game, then create a primary key over uid
and gid
in the votes
table instead of just a normal index.
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `votes` (
`uid` int(8) unsigned NOT NULL,
`gid` int(8) unsigned NOT NULL,
`vote` int(1) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`gid`, `uid`)
) ;
The order of the primary key's fields (first gid
, then uid
) is important so the index is sorted by gid
first. That makes the index especially useful for selects with a given gid
. If you want to select all the votes a given user has made then add another index with just uid
.
I would recommend InnoDB for storage engine because especially in high load settings the table locks will kill your performance. For read performance you can implement a caching system using APC, Memcached or others.
Looks good.
I would have used users_id & games_id instead of gid and uid which sounds like global id and unique id
Whatever you end up doing, make sure you test it with a large data-set (even if you don't plan on having a huge number of users)
Write a script that generates 100,000 games, 50,000 users and a million votes. May be slightly excessive, but if your queries don't take hours with that number of items, it'll never be an issue
Looks good so far. Don't forget indices and foreign keys. In my experience most issues don't arise from not-so-well-thought-out designs but from the lack of indices and foreign keys.
Also, regarding the storage engine selection I have yet to see a reason (in a reasonably complex/sized app) for not using innodb, not just because of transactional semantics.
you might want to add a voted_on
(DATETIME) column too. That way, you could, say, see a game's trend in a certain timespan, or just in case someday a vote spam happened, you could delete unwanted votes accurately.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/621065/efficient-mysql-table-structure-for-rating-system