Suppose I have the code:
class A(implicit s:String = "foo"){println(s)}
object X {
implicit val s1 = "hello"
}
object Y {
import X._
// do something with X
implicit val s2 = "hi"
val a = new A
}
I get the error:
<console>:14: error: ambiguous implicit values:
both value s2 in object Y of type => String
and value s1 in object X of type => String
match expected type String
val a = new A
Is there any way I can tell Scala to use the value s2
in Y
?
(if I rename s2
to s1
, it works as expected but that is not what I want).
Another solution is to not do import X._
, again something I'm trying to avoid.
Another thing you can do is to import everything but s1
: import X.{s1 => _, _}
.
I agree with the other answer that explicitly providing the implicit in these types of situations is preferred, but if you insist on wanting to 'downgrade' the other implicit so it's no longer treated as an implicit then it is actually possible:
class A(implicit s:String = "foo"){println(s)}
object X {
implicit val s1 = "hello"
}
object Y {
import X._
val s1 = X.s1 //downgrade to non-implicit
// do something with X
implicit val s2 = "hi"
val a = new A
}
Again, this is a bit hackish, but it works.
Try:
new A()(s2)
This should override the implicit parameter through er explicitly providing it.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28780101/how-to-override-an-implicit-value