Curried anonymous function in SML

六月ゝ 毕业季﹏ 提交于 2019-12-03 15:11:46

问题


I have the function below and it works:

(fn x => x * 2) 2; 

but this one doesn't work:

(fn x y => x + y ) 2 3;

Can anyone tell me why? Or give me some hint to get it to work?


回答1:


(fn x => fn y => x+y) 2 3; works. fn simply doesn't have the same syntactic sugar to define curried functions that fun has.




回答2:


In Standard ML, a function can have only one argument, so use

(fn (x,y) => x + y) (2,3) 

and the type is

fn: int * int -> int

in this time (x,y) and (2,3) is a list structure,




回答3:


The answers posted above are correct. SML functions take only one argument. As a result, SML functions can have only one of two input types :

1) t = (t1 * t2 * ... * tN) , for some N

2) t = a, for some a.

So, technically speaking, SML only takes product types or unary types as arguments to functions. One can more generally think of this as an Unary-Type or a projection of some product Type.

In order to have currying inside anonymous functions, feel free to nest them inside each other as : fn x1 => fn x2 => ... fn xN => ...

I think it's also important to know that : fun a = fn x1 => fn x2 => ... fn xN => ... is the full expansion of the syntact sugar : fun a x1 x2 .. xN



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2437019/curried-anonymous-function-in-sml

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!