This is just for curiosity
Why does this code work:
Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @Value = "0"})
and this doesn't:
Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @value = "0"})
Note the uppercase 'V' in @Value
I know value
is a keyword, but so is readonly
and it works. It's not necessary to use @Readonly
(with uppercase 'R').
Does anybody have a clue?
I'm not 100% sure but, that could be value
is a keyword in properties, readonly
isn't. Look at properties from MSDN.
InputExtensions.TextBoxFor
special cases cases a few attribute names, among them value
(case sensitive). This is unrelated to C# keywords.
In particular the value obtained from the expression
parameter takes precedence of a property called value
you pass into the htmlAttributes
parameter.
Taking a look at your example:
If you use
Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @value = "0"})
it will compile, butTextBoxFor
will override thevalue
attribute with the valuex.Age
evaluates to.If you use
Html.TextBoxFor(x => x.Age, new { @Value = "0"})
it will compile, and you will get two entries in the attribute dictionary, oneValue
that's"0"
, and onevalue
, that'sx.Age
.I expect the output to be something nonsensical like
<input Value="0" value="..." type="text"/>
.
My guess is that the MVC code is hard coded to look for Value
because a MS engineer intended you to always use PascalCase property names, since that's their typical convention and PascalCase avoids conflicts with non-contextual keywords such as class
. Notice how PascalCase properties get rendered in the HTML as lowercase.
The reason is not about value
being a keyword, since it's a contextual keyword in C# and only has special meaning (and thus turns blue in the IDE) in property getters and setters. It has no special meaning in the anonymous type passed to TextBoxFor
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14142511/textboxfor-value-uppercase-instead-value