问题
In Ruby, what is the most expressive way to map an array in such a way that certain elements are modified and the others left untouched?
This is a straight-forward way to do it:
old_a = ["a", "b", "c"] # ["a", "b", "c"]
new_a = old_a.map { |x| (x=="b" ? x+"!" : x) } # ["a", "b!", "c"]
Omitting the "leave-alone" case of course if not enough:
new_a = old_a.map { |x| x+"!" if x=="b" } # [nil, "b!", nil]
What I would like is something like this:
new_a = old_a.map_modifying_only_elements_where (Proc.new {|x| x == "b"})
do |y|
y + "!"
end
# ["a", "b!", "c"]
Is there some nice way to do this in Ruby (or maybe Rails has some kind of convenience method that I haven't found yet)?
Thanks everybody for replying. While you collectively convinced me that it's best to just use map
with the ternary operator, some of you posted very interesting answers!
回答1:
I agree that the map statement is good as it is. It's clear and simple,, and would easy for anyone to maintain.
If you want something more complex, how about this?
module Enumerable
def enum_filter(&filter)
FilteredEnumerator.new(self, &filter)
end
alias :on :enum_filter
class FilteredEnumerator
include Enumerable
def initialize(enum, &filter)
@enum, @filter = enum, filter
if enum.respond_to?(:map!)
def self.map!
@enum.map! { |elt| @filter[elt] ? yield(elt) : elt }
end
end
end
def each
@enum.each { |elt| yield(elt) if @filter[elt] }
end
def each_with_index
@enum.each_with_index { |elt,index| yield(elt, index) if @filter[elt] }
end
def map
@enum.map { |elt| @filter[elt] ? yield(elt) : elt }
end
alias :and :enum_filter
def or
FilteredEnumerator.new(@enum) { |elt| @filter[elt] || yield(elt) }
end
end
end
%w{ a b c }.on { |x| x == 'b' }.map { |x| x + "!" } #=> [ 'a', 'b!', 'c' ]
require 'set'
Set.new(%w{ He likes dogs}).on { |x| x.length % 2 == 0 }.map! { |x| x.reverse } #=> #<Set: {"likes", "eH", "sgod"}>
('a'..'z').on { |x| x[0] % 6 == 0 }.or { |x| 'aeiouy'[x] }.to_a.join #=> "aefiloruxy"
回答2:
Because arrays are pointers, this also works:
a = ["hello", "to", "you", "dude"]
a.select {|i| i.length <= 3 }.each {|i| i << "!" }
puts a.inspect
# => ["hello", "to!", "you!", "dude"]
In the loop, make sure you use a method that alters the object rather than creating a new object. E.g. upcase!
compared to upcase
.
The exact procedure depends on what exactly you are trying to achieve. It's hard to nail a definite answer with foo-bar examples.
回答3:
old_a.map! { |a| a == "b" ? a + "!" : a }
gives
=> ["a", "b!", "c"]
map!
modifies the receiver in place, so old_a
is now that returned array.
回答4:
Your map
solution is the best one. I'm not sure why you think map_modifying_only_elements_where is somehow better. Using map
is cleaner, more concise, and doesn't require multiple blocks.
回答5:
One liner:
["a", "b", "c"].inject([]) { |cumulative, i| i == "b" ? (cumulative << "#{i}!") : cumulative }
In the code above, you start with [] "cumulative". As you enumerate through an Enumerator (in our case the array, ["a", "b", "c"]), cumulative as well as "the current" item get passed to our block (|cumulative, i|) and the result of our block's execution is assigned to cumulative. What I do above is keep cumulative unchanged when the item isn't "b" and append "b!" to cumulative array and return it when it is a b.
There is an answer above that uses select
, which is the easiest way to do (and remember) it.
You can combine select
with map
in order to achieve what you're looking for:
arr = ["a", "b", "c"].select { |i| i == "b" }.map { |i| "#{i}!" }
=> ["b!"]
Inside the select
block, you specify the conditions for an element to be "selected". This will return an array. You can call "map" on the resulting array to append the exclamation mark to it.
回答6:
If you don't need the old array, I prefer map! in this case because you can use the ! method to represent you are changing the array in place.
self.answers.map!{ |x| (x=="b" ? x+"!" : x) }
I prefer this over:
new_map = self.old_map{ |x| (x=="b" ? x+"!" : x) }
回答7:
It's a few lines long, but here's an alternative for the hell of it:
oa = %w| a b c |
na = oa.partition { |a| a == 'b' }
na.first.collect! { |a| a+'!' }
na.flatten! #Add .sort! here if you wish
p na
# >> ["b!", "a", "c"]
The collect with ternary seems best in my opinion.
回答8:
I've found that the best way to accomplish this is by using tap
arr = [1,2,3,4,5,6]
[].tap do |a|
arr.each { |x| a << x if x%2==0 }
end
回答9:
Ruby 2.7+
As of 2.7 there's a definitive answer.
Ruby 2.7 is introducing filter_map
for this exact purpose. It's idiomatic and performant, and I'd expect it to become the norm very soon.
For example:
numbers = [1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 13]
enum.filter_map { |i| i * 2 if i.even? }
# => [4, 16, 20]
Here's a good read on the subject.
Hope that's useful to someone!
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/614335/map-an-array-modifying-only-elements-matching-a-certain-condition