Help me out folks - why does this code cause a VerificationException when run under .NET 4.0?
public T parseEnum<T>(string value, T defaultValue) {
//Removing the following lines fixes the problem
if (!typeof(T).IsEnum) throw new ArgumentException("T must be an enumerated type");
return defaultValue;
}
I ran peverify
on the .net 2.0 assembly and got the following message:
ImageResizer.Util.Utils::parseEnum[T]][offset 0x0000000A] The 'this' parameter to the call must be the calling method's 'this' parameter.
This causes a VerificationException: Operation could destabilize the runtime
message when running the code under medium trust.
I've already read all the similar-looking posts on stack overflow, and none of them apply to this code.
Is there something new with generics that would cause this code to be somehow invalid?
The underlying reason for the error is a change in the signature of IsEnum.
In .NET 2.0 (and 3.0), IsEnum wasn't a virtual method:
public bool IsEnum { get; }
The assembly emitted to call it is:
call instance bool [mscorlib]System.Type::get_IsEnum()
In .NET 4.0, IsEnum is a virtual method:
public virtual bool IsEnum { get; }
Here is the same line of assembly for 4.0:
callvirt instance bool [mscorlib]System.Type::get_IsEnum()
The error you're getting was added in peverify just before the 2.0 release, and warns when a virtual method is called non-virtually.
Now, peverify
loads up your code, loads .NET 4.0, and then checks your code. Since your code calls the (.NET 4.0) virtual method non-virtually, the error is shown.
One would think that since you're building against the .NET 2.0 version, this should be fine, and it would load the .NET 2.0 CLR to check. It doesn't seem so.
Edit:
In order to check this, I downloaded .NET 2.0's SDK and tried the peverify
in there. It correctly verifies the code.
So the message would seem to be this: use a peverify
which matches the target framework of your code.
Solution:
It seems that the _Type
interface provides a solution to this:
if (((_Type)typeof(T)).IsEnum) ...
The documentation says it is designed to be called from unmanaged code, but as a side effect of it being an interface, it provides a stable (virtual) method to call.
I have confirmed that it works with peverify
whether you target 2.0 or 4.0.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6919808/why-does-this-line-cause-a-verificationexception-when-running-under-net-4