问题
I'm trying to sync some of my web component properties between instances of the same element so if one of this properties changes then the same property gets updated in all the instances with the corresponding binding and events.
Note: I want to use the Polymer Data System Concepts for the communications between instances.
Example
my-element.html
<dom-module id="my-element">
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'my-element',
properties: {
myProp: {
type: String,
notify: true
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
my-other-element.html
<dom-module id="my-other-element">
<template>
<my-element my-prop="{{otherProp}}"></my-element>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'my-other-element',
properties: {
otherProp: {
type: String,
notify: true,
readOnly: true
}
}
})
</script>
</dom-module>
my-app.html
<dom-module id="my-app">
<template>
<my-element id="element"></my-element>
<my-other-element id="otherElement"
on-other-prop-changed="onPropChanged"
></my-other-element>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'my-app',
attached: function () {
// should set 'myProp' to 'test' and trigger
// the event 'my-prop-changed' in all my-element instances
this.$.element.myProp = 'test'
},
onPropChanged: function (ev, detail) {
console.log(detail.value); // should print 'test'
console.log(this.$.element.myProp); // should print 'test'
console.log(this.$.otherElement.otherProp); // should print 'test'
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
PD: Would be good to use standard like patterns and good practices.
回答1:
tl;dr
I have created a custom behaviour that syncs all elements' properties that have notify: true
. Working prototype: JSBin.
Currently, this prototype does not distinguish between different kinds of elements, meaning that it can only sync instances of the same custom element - but this can be changed without much effort.
You could also tailor the behaviour so that is syncs only the desired properties and not just all with notify: true
. However, if you take this path, be advised that all the properties you want to sync must have notify: true
, since the behaviour listens to the <property-name>-changed
event, which is fired only if the property has notify: true
.
The details
Let's start with the custom SyncBehavior
behaviour:
(function() {
var SyncBehaviorInstances = [];
var SyncBehaviorLock = false;
SyncBehavior = {
attached: function() {
// Add instance
SyncBehaviorInstances.push(this);
// Add listeners
for(var property in this.properties) {
if('notify' in this.properties[property] && this.properties[property].notify) {
// Watch all properties with notify = true
var eventHanler = this._eventHandlerForPropertyType(this.properties[property].type.name);
this.listen(this, Polymer.CaseMap.camelToDashCase(property) + '-changed', eventHanler);
}
}
},
detached: function() {
// Remove instance
var index = SyncBehaviorInstances.indexOf(this);
if(index >= 0) {
SyncBehaviorInstances.splice(index, 1);
}
// Remove listeners
for(var property in this.properties) {
if('notify' in this.properties[property] && this.properties[property].notify) {
// Watch all properties with notify = true
var eventHanler = this._eventHandlerForPropertyType(this.properties[property].type.name);
this.unlisten(this, Polymer.CaseMap.camelToDashCase(property) + '-changed', eventHanler);
}
}
},
_eventHandlerForPropertyType: function(propertyType) {
switch(propertyType) {
case 'Array':
return '__syncArray';
case 'Object':
return '__syncObject';
default:
return '__syncPrimitive';
}
},
__syncArray: function(event, details) {
if(SyncBehaviorLock) {
return; // Prevent cycles
}
SyncBehaviorLock = true; // Lock
var target = event.target;
var prop = Polymer.CaseMap.dashToCamelCase(event.type.substr(0, event.type.length - 8));
if(details.path === undefined) {
// New array -> assign by reference
SyncBehaviorInstances.forEach(function(instance) {
if(instance !== target) {
instance.set(prop, details.value);
}
});
} else if(details.path.endsWith('.splices')) {
// Array mutation -> apply notifySplices
var splices = details.value.indexSplices;
// for all other instances: assign reference if not the same, otherwise call 'notifySplices'
SyncBehaviorInstances.forEach(function(instance) {
if(instance !== target) {
var instanceReference = instance.get(prop);
var targetReference = target.get(prop);
if(instanceReference !== targetReference) {
instance.set(prop, targetReference);
} else {
instance.notifySplices(prop, splices);
}
}
});
}
SyncBehaviorLock = false; // Unlock
},
__syncObject: function(event, details) {
var target = event.target;
var prop = Polymer.CaseMap.dashToCamelCase(event.type.substr(0, event.type.length - 8));
if(details.path === undefined) {
// New object -> assign by reference
SyncBehaviorInstances.forEach(function(instance) {
if(instance !== target) {
instance.set(prop, details.value);
}
});
} else {
// Property change -> assign by reference if not the same, otherwise call 'notifyPath'
SyncBehaviorInstances.forEach(function(instance) {
if(instance !== target) {
var instanceReference = instance.get(prop);
var targetReference = target.get(prop);
if(instanceReference !== targetReference) {
instance.set(prop, targetReference);
} else {
instance.notifyPath(details.path, details.value);
}
}
});
}
},
__syncPrimitive: function(event, details) {
var target = event.target;
var value = details.value;
var prop = Polymer.CaseMap.dashToCamelCase(event.type.substr(0, event.type.length - 8));
SyncBehaviorInstances.forEach(function(instance) {
if(instance !== target) {
instance.set(prop, value);
}
});
},
};
})();
Notice that I have used the IIFE pattern to hide the variable that holds all instances of the custom element my-element
. This is essential, so don't change it.
As you can see, the behaviour consists of six functions, namely:
attached
, which adds the current instance to the list of instances and registers listeners for all properties withnotify: true
.detached
, which removes the current instance from the list of instances and removes listeners for all properties withnotify: true
._eventHandlerForPropertyType
, which returns the name of one of the functions 4-6, depending on the property type.__syncArray
, which syncs the Array type properties between the instances. Notice that I ignore the current target and implement a simple locking mechanism in order to avoid cycles. The method handles two scenarios: assigning a new Array, and mutating an existing Array.__syncObject
, which syncs the Object type properties between the instances. Notice that I ignore the current target and implement a simple locking mechanism in order to avoid cycles. The method handles two scenarios: assigning a new Object, and changing a property of an existing Object.__syncPrimitive
, which syncs the primitive values of properties between the instances. Notice that I ignore the current target in order to avoid cycles.
In order to test-drive my new behaviour, I have created a sample custom element:
<dom-module id="my-element">
<template>
<style>
:host {
display: block;
}
</style>
<h2>Hello [[id]]</h2>
<ul>
<li>propString: [[propString]]</li>
<li>
propArray:
<ol>
<template is="dom-repeat" items="[[propArray]]">
<li>[[item]]</li>
</template>
</ol>
</li>
<li>
propObject:
<ul>
<li>name: [[propObject.name]]</li>
<li>surname: [[propObject.surname]]</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'my-element',
behaviors: [
SyncBehavior,
],
properties: {
id: {
type: String,
},
propString: {
type: String,
notify: true,
value: 'default value',
},
propArray: {
type: Array,
notify: true,
value: function() {
return ['a', 'b', 'c'];
},
},
propObject: {
type: Object,
notify: true,
value: function() {
return {'name': 'John', 'surname': 'Doe'};
},
},
},
pushToArray: function(item) {
this.push('propArray', item);
},
pushToNewArray: function(item) {
this.set('propArray', [item]);
},
popFromArray: function() {
this.pop('propArray');
},
setObjectName: function(name) {
this.set('propObject.name', name);
},
setNewObjectName: function(name) {
this.set('propObject', {'name': name, 'surname': 'unknown'});
},
});
</script>
</dom-module>
It has one String property, one Array property, and one Object property; all with notify: true
. The custom element also implements the SyncBehavior
behaviour.
To combine all of the above in a working prototype, you simply do this:
<template is="dom-bind">
<h4>Primitive type</h4>
propString: <input type="text" value="{{propString::input}}" />
<h4>Array type</h4>
Push to propArray: <input type="text" id="propArrayItem" /> <button onclick="_propArrayItem()">Push</button> <button onclick="_propNewArrayItem()">Push to NEW array</button> <button onclick="_propPopArrayItem()">Delete last element</button>
<h4>Object type</h4>
Set 'name' of propObject: <input type="text" id="propObjectName" /> <button onclick="_propObjectName()">Set</button> <button onclick="_propNewObjectName()">Set to NEW object</button> <br />
<script>
function _propArrayItem() {
one.pushToArray(propArrayItem.value);
}
function _propNewArrayItem() {
one.pushToNewArray(propArrayItem.value);
}
function _propPopArrayItem() {
one.popFromArray();
}
function _propObjectName() {
one.setObjectName(propObjectName.value);
}
function _propNewObjectName() {
one.setNewObjectName(propObjectName.value);
}
</script>
<my-element id="one" prop-string="{{propString}}"></my-element>
<my-element id="two"></my-element>
<my-element id="three"></my-element>
<my-element id="four"></my-element>
</template>
In this prototype, I have created four instances of my-element
. One has propString
bound to an input, while the others don't have any bindings at all. I have created a simple form, that covers every scenario I could think of:
- Changing a primitive value.
- Pushing an item to an array.
- Creating a new array (with one item).
- Deleting an item from the array.
- Setting object property.
- Creating a new object.
EDIT
I have updated my post and the prototype in order to address the following issues:
- Syncing of non-primitive values, namely Array and Object.
- Properly converting property names from Dash case to Camel case (and vice-versa).
回答2:
We have created a component to synchronize data among different instances. Our component is:
<dom-module id="sync-data">
<template>
<p>Debug info: {scope:[[scope]], key:[[key]], value:[[value]]}</p>
</template>
<script>
(function () {
var items = []
var propagateChangeStatus = {}
var togglePropagationStatus = function (status) {
propagateChangeStatus[this.scope + '|' + this.key] = status
}
var shouldPropagateChange = function () {
return propagateChangeStatus[this.scope + '|' + this.key] !== false
}
var propagateChange = function (key, scope, value) {
if (shouldPropagateChange.call(this)) {
togglePropagationStatus.call(this, false)
var itemsLength = items.length
for (var idx = 0; idx < itemsLength; idx += 1) {
if (items[idx] !== this && items[idx].key === key && items[idx].scope === scope) {
items[idx].set('value', value)
}
}
togglePropagationStatus.call(this, true)
}
}
Polymer({
is: 'sync-data',
properties: {
key: {
type: String,
value: ''
},
scope: {
type: String,
value: ''
},
value: {
type: String,
notify: true,
observer: '_handleValueChanged',
value: ''
}
},
created: function () {
items.push(this)
},
_handleValueChanged: function (newValue, oldValue) {
this.typeof = typeof newValue
propagateChange.call(this, this.key, this.scope, newValue)
}
})
})()
</script>
</dom-module>
And we use it in a component like this:
<sync-data
key="email"
scope="user"
value="{{email}}"></sync-data>
And in another component like this:
<sync-data
key="email"
scope="user"
value="{{userEmail}}"></sync-data>
In this way we get the native behavior of polymer for events and bindings
回答3:
My personal opinion on problems like this is to use flux architecture.
you create a wrapper Element which is distributing all the information to the children. All changes a going via the main component.
<app-wrapper>
<component-x attr="[[someParam]]" />
<component-x attr="[[someParam]]" />
<component-x attr="[[someParam]]" />
</app-wrapper>
the component-x
is firing an change value event on app-wrapper
and the app-wrapper
is updating someValue
, note it's a one-way-binding.
There is a component for this, which is implementing the redux
architecture, but its also possible to code your own. It's more or less the observer pattern
回答4:
Try this for my-app.html. I don't see any reason to not use two-way bindings here.
<dom-module id="my-app">
<template>
<my-element my-prop="{{myProp}}"></my-element>
<my-element my-prop="{{myProp}}"></my-element>
</template>
<script>
Polymer({
is: 'my-app',
ready: function() {
this.myProp = 'test';
}
});
</script>
</dom-module>
Although it's probably a better practice to give myProp
a default value by using the properties
object rather than the ready
callback. Example:
Polymer({
is: 'my-app',
properties: {
myProp: {
type: String,
value: 'test'
}
});
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42011092/best-way-to-communicate-between-instances-of-the-same-web-component-with-polymer