Apply function to each column in a data frame observing each columns existing data type

问题

I'm trying to get the min/max for each column in a large data frame, as part of getting to know my data. My first try was:

apply(t,2,max,na.rm=1)

It treats everything as a character vector, because the first few columns are character types. So max of some of the numeric columns is coming out as " -99.5".

I then tried this:

sapply(t,max,na.rm=1)

but it complains about max not meaningful for factors. (lapply is the same.) What is confusing me is that apply thought max was perfectly meaningful for factors, e.g. it returned "ZEBRA" for column 1.

BTW, I took a look at Using sapply on vector of POSIXct and one of the answers says "When you use sapply, your objects are coerced to numeric,...". Is this what is happening to me? If so, is there an alternative apply function that does not coerce? Surely it is a common need, as one of the key features of the data frame type is that each column can be a different type.

回答1:

If it were an "ordered factor" things would be different. Which is not to say I like "ordered factors", I don't, only to say that some relationships are defined for 'ordered factors' that are not defined for "factors". Factors are thought of as ordinary categorical variables. You are seeing the natural sort order of factors which is alphabetical lexical order for your locale. If you want to get an automatic coercion to "numeric" for every column, ... dates and factors and all, then try:

sapply(df, function(x) max(as.numeric(x)) )   # not generally a useful result

Or if you want to test for factors first and return as you expect then:

sapply( df, function(x) if("factor" %in% class(x) ) { 
            max(as.numeric(as.character(x)))
            } else { max(x) } )

@Darrens comment does work better:

 sapply(df, function(x) max(as.character(x)) )

max does succeed with character vectors.

回答2:

The reason that max works with apply is that apply is coercing your data frame to a matrix first, and a matrix can only hold one data type. So you end up with a matrix of characters. sapply is just a wrapper for lapply, so it is not surprising that both yield the same error.

The default behavior when you create a data frame is for categorical columns to be stored as factors. Unless you specify that it is an ordered factor, operations like max and min will be undefined, since R is assuming that you've created an unordered factor.

You can change this behavior by specifying options(stringsAsFactors = FALSE), which will change the default for the entire session, or you can pass stringsAsFactors = FALSE in the data.frame() construction call itself. Note that this just means that min and max will assume "alphabetical" ordering by default.

Or you can manually specify an ordering for each factor, although I doubt that's what you want to do.

Regardless, sapply will generally yield an atomic vector, which will entail converting everything to characters in many cases. One way around this is as follows:

#Some test data
d <- data.frame(v1 = runif(10), v2 = letters[1:10], 
                v3 = rnorm(10), v4 = LETTERS[1:10],stringsAsFactors = TRUE)

d[4,] <- NA

#Similar function to DWin's answer          
fun <- function(x){
    if(is.numeric(x)){max(x,na.rm = 1)}
    else{max(as.character(x),na.rm=1)}
}   

#Use colwise from plyr package
colwise(fun)(d)
         v1 v2       v3 v4
1 0.8478983  j 1.999435  J

回答3:

If you want to learn your data summary (df) provides the min, 1st quantile, median and mean, 3rd quantile and max of numerical columns and the frequency of the top levels of the factor columns.

回答4:

building on @ltamar's answer:
Use summary and munge the output into something useful!

library(tidyr)
library(dplyr)

df %>% 
  summary %>% 
  data.frame %>%
  select(-Var1) %>%
  separate(data=.,col=Freq,into = c('metric','value'),sep = ':') %>%
  rename(column_name=Var2) %>%
  mutate(value=as.numeric(value),
         metric = trimws(metric,'both') 
  ) %>%  
  filter(!is.na(value)) -> metrics

It's not pretty and it is certainly not fast but it gets the job done!

回答5:

A solution using retype() from hablar to coerce factors to character or numeric type depending on feasability. I'd use dplyr for applying max to each column.

Code

library(dplyr)
library(hablar)

# Retype() simplifies each columns type, e.g. always removes factors
d <- d %>% retype()

# Check max for each column
d %>% summarise_all(max)

Result

Not the new column types.

     v1 v2       v3 v4   
  <dbl> <chr> <dbl> <chr>
1 0.974 j      1.09 J

Data

# Sample data borrowed from @joran
d <- data.frame(v1 = runif(10), v2 = letters[1:10], 
                v3 = rnorm(10), v4 = LETTERS[1:10],stringsAsFactors = TRUE)

回答6:

The absolute best way to do this is avoid base *apply functions, which coerces the entire data frame to array, and use colwise from plyr. (I'm surprised no one has mentioned this)

Example using parse_guess as a function that operates on all kinds of vector datatypes:

colwise(parse_guess)(t)

Less interesting answer: we can apply on each column with a for-loop:

for (i in 1:nrow(t)) { t[, i] <- parse_guess(t[, i]) }

I don't know of a good way of doing assignment with *apply while preserving data frame structure.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7303322/apply-function-to-each-column-in-a-data-frame-observing-each-columns-existing-da

标签

apply

sapply