Exclude author from gerrit review

亡梦爱人 提交于 2019-12-03 05:10:20

I found a very easy answer in this google group: groups.google.com/disable-self-review

In a parent project (default is the All-Projects project) add this to the project.config file in refs/meta/config branch:

[access "refs/*"]
label-Code-Review = block -2..+2 group Change Owner

and in the groups file in the same branch add this line

global:Change-Owner Change Owner

Then take the statement that allows the right into the child project's project.config:

label-Code-Review = -2..+2 group Developers

Make sure to do write the block statement in the parent project and give the rights in the child project. If allow and block are in the same file the allow will overrule (See this). This will block the owner of a change to give -2 or +2. It will leave the -1 and +1 options intact. You can add a similar statement for any other custom labels you might use.

I'm not sure that this what you are looking for but it might give you some inspiration. According to this discussion the following fragment approves changes only if the reviewer and the change owner are not the same person.

  % If a reviewer approved the change, its OK.
  submit_rule(submit(CR)) :-
    change_owner(Owner),
    max_with_block('Code-Review', -2, 2, ok(Reviewer)),
    not_same(Owner, Reviewer),
    CR = label('Code-Review', ok(Reviewer)),
    !.
hair raisin

I posted this answer to the question that you linked to, but it may lead you in the right direction:

I wrote this prolog filter for our Gerrit installation. I did it as a submit_filter in the parent project because I wanted it to apply to all projects in our system.

%filter to require all projects to have a code-reviewer other than the owner
submit_filter(In, Out) :-
    %unpack the submit rule into a list of code reviews
    In =.. [submit | Ls],
    %add the non-owner code review requiremet
    reject_self_review(Ls, R),
    %pack the list back up and return it (kinda)
    Out =.. [submit | R].

reject_self_review(S1, S2) :-
    %set O to be the change owner
    gerrit:change_owner(O),
    %find a +2 code review, if it exists, and set R to be the reviewer
    gerrit:commit_label(label('Code-Review', 2), R), 
    %if there is a +2 review from someone other than the owner, then the filter has no work to do, assign S2 to S1
    R \= O, !,
    %the cut (!) predicate prevents further rules from being consulted
    S2 = S1.
reject_self_review(S1, S2) :-
    %set O to be the change owner
    gerrit:change_owner(O),
    %find a +2 code review, if it exists, and set R to be the reviewer - comment sign was missing
    gerrit:commit_label(label('Code-Review', 2), R), 
    R = O, !,
    %if there isn't a +2 from someone else (above rule), and there is a +2 from the owner, reject with a self-reviewed label
    S2 = [label('Self-Reviewed', reject(O))|S1].
%if the above two rules didn't make it to the ! predicate, there aren't any +2s so let the default rules through unfiltered
reject_self_review(S1, S1).

The benefits (IMO) of this rule over rule #8 from the cookbook are:

  • The Self-Reviewed label is only shown when the the change is being blocked, rather than adding a Non-Author-Code-Review label to every change
  • By using reject(O) the rule causes the Self-Reviewed label to literally be a red flag
  • As a submit_filter instead of a submit_rule, this rule is installed in a parent project and applies to all sub-projects

Please Note: This rule is authored to prevent the Owner from self-reviewing a change, while the example from the cookbook compares against the Author. Depending on your workflow, you may want to replace the 2 gerrit:change_owner(O) predicates with gerrit:commit_author(O) or gerrit:commit_committer(O)

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!