From the "our" perldoc:
our has the same scoping rules as my, but does not necessarily create a variable.
This means that variables declared with our
should not be visible across files, because file is the largest lexical scope. But this is not true. Why?
You can consider our
to create a lexically-scoped alias to a package global variable. Package globals are accessible from everywhere; that's what makes them global. But the name created by our
is only visible within the lexical scope of the our
declaration.
package A;
use strict;
{
our $var; # $var is now a legal name for $A::var
$var = 42; # LEGAL
}
say $var; # ILLEGAL: "global symbol $var requires explicit package name"
say $A::var; # LEGAL (always)
{
our $var; # This is the same $var as before, back in scope
$var *= 2; # LEGAL
say $var; # 84
}
You have a good answer already, but perhaps this will be helpful as well.
The our
declaration combines aspects of my
and use vars
. It functions similarly to use vars
in that it declares package variables; however, variables declared in this way are lexically scoped and cannot be accessed outside the scope in which they were declared (unless you use the fully qualified name of the variable). In addition, a variable declared with our
is visible across its entire lexical scope, even across package boundaries.
Here's a table that I added to my Perl notes a while back. For an example, see this SO answer.
Scope/ Package
Namespace Variable Private New
---------------------------------------------------
my Lexical No Yes Yes
our Lexical Yes No No
use vars Package Yes No No
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3626190/why-are-variables-declared-with-our-visible-across-files