问题
I am currently following this workbook on build an operating system.
My intention is to write a 64-bit kernel. I have got as far as loading the "kernel" code and writing individual characters to the frame buffer while in text mode.
My problem appears when I add a level of indirection to writing a single character to the frame buffer by wrapping the code in a function. It would appear that the char value passed into the function is being corrupted in some way.
I have three files:
bootloader.asm
; bootloader.asm
[org 0x7c00]
KERNEL_OFFSET equ 0x1000
mov bp, 0x9000
mov sp, bp
; load the kernel from boot disk
mov bx, KERNEL_OFFSET
mov dl, dl ; boot drive is set to dl
mov ah, 0x02 ; bios read sector
mov al, 15 ; read 15 sectors
mov ch, 0x00 ; cylinder 0
mov cl, 0x02 ; read from 2nd sector
mov dh, 0x00 ; select head 0
int 0x13
; THERE COULD BE ERRORS HERE BUT FOR NOW ASSUME IT WORKS
; switch to protected mode
cli
lgdt [gdt.descriptor]
mov eax, cr0
or eax, 1
mov cr0, eax
jmp CODE_SEGMENT:start_protected_mode
[bits 32]
start_protected_mode:
mov ax, DATA_SEGMENT
mov ds, ax
mov ss, ax
mov es, ax
mov fs, ax
mov gs, ax
mov ebp, 0x90000
mov esp, ebp
call KERNEL_OFFSET
jmp $
[bits 16]
gdt: ; Super Simple Global Descriptor Table
.start:
.null:
dd 0x0
dd 0x0
.code:
dw 0xffff
dw 0x0
db 0x0
db 10011010b
db 11001111b
db 0x0
.data:
dw 0xffff
dw 0x0
db 0x0
db 10010010b
db 11001111b
db 0x0
.end:
.descriptor:
dw .end - .start
dd .start
CODE_SEGMENT equ gdt.code - gdt.start
DATA_SEGMENT equ gdt.data - gdt.start
times 510-($-$$) db 0
dw 0xaa55
bootkernel.asm
[bits 32]
[extern main]
[global _start]
_start:
call main
jmp $
kernel.c
// LEGACY MODE VIDEO DRIVER
#define FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS 0xb8002
#define GREY_ON_BLACK 0x07
#define WHITE_ON_BLACK 0x0f
void write_memory(unsigned long address, unsigned int index, unsigned char value)
{
unsigned char * memory = (unsigned char *) address;
memory[index] = value;
}
unsigned int frame_buffer_offset(unsigned int col, unsigned int row)
{
return 2 * ((row * 80u) + col);
}
void write_frame_buffer_cell(unsigned char c, unsigned char a, unsigned int col, unsigned int row)
{
unsigned int offset = frame_buffer_offset(col, row);
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset, c);
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset + 1, a);
}
void main()
{
unsigned int offset = frame_buffer_offset(0, 1);
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset, 'A');
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset + 1, GREY_ON_BLACK);
write_frame_buffer_cell('B', GREY_ON_BLACK, 0, 1);
}
The .text section is linked to start from 0x1000 which is where the bootloader expects the kernel to start.
The linker.ld script is
SECTIONS
{
. = 0x1000;
.text : { *(.text) } /* Kernel is expected at 0x1000 */
}
The Make file that puts this all together is:
bootloader.bin: bootloader.asm
nasm -f bin bootloader.asm -o bootloader.bin
bootkernel.o: bootkernel.asm
nasm -f elf64 bootkernel.asm -o bootkernel.o
kernel.o: kernel.c
gcc-6 -Wextra -Wall -ffreestanding -c kernel.c -o kernel.o
kernel.bin: bootkernel.o kernel.o linker.ld
ld -o kernel.bin -T linker.ld bootkernel.o kernel.o --oformat binary
os-image: bootloader.bin kernel.bin
cat bootloader.bin kernel.bin > os-image
qemu: os-image
qemu-system-x86_64 -d guest_errors -fda os-image -boot a
I've taken a screen shot of the output that I am getting. I expect 'A' to appear in the 0th column of the 1st row and for 'B' to appear on the 1st column of the 0th row. For some reason I am getting another character.
Output of gcc-6 -S kernel.c
.file "kernel.c"
.text
.globl write_memory
.type write_memory, @function
write_memory:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
movq %rdi, -24(%rbp)
movl %esi, -28(%rbp)
movl %edx, %eax
movb %al, -32(%rbp)
movq -24(%rbp), %rax
movq %rax, -8(%rbp)
movl -28(%rbp), %edx
movq -8(%rbp), %rax
addq %rax, %rdx
movzbl -32(%rbp), %eax
movb %al, (%rdx)
nop
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size write_memory, .-write_memory
.globl frame_buffer_offset
.type frame_buffer_offset, @function
frame_buffer_offset:
.LFB1:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
movl %edi, -4(%rbp)
movl %esi, -8(%rbp)
movl -8(%rbp), %edx
movl %edx, %eax
sall $2, %eax
addl %edx, %eax
sall $4, %eax
movl %eax, %edx
movl -4(%rbp), %eax
addl %edx, %eax
addl %eax, %eax
popq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE1:
.size frame_buffer_offset, .-frame_buffer_offset
.globl write_frame_buffer_cell
.type write_frame_buffer_cell, @function
write_frame_buffer_cell:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
subq $32, %rsp
movl %esi, %eax
movl %edx, -28(%rbp)
movl %ecx, -32(%rbp)
movb %dil, -20(%rbp)
movb %al, -24(%rbp)
movl -32(%rbp), %edx
movl -28(%rbp), %eax
movl %edx, %esi
movl %eax, %edi
call frame_buffer_offset
movl %eax, -4(%rbp)
movzbl -20(%rbp), %edx
movl -4(%rbp), %eax
movl %eax, %esi
movl $753666, %edi
call write_memory
movzbl -24(%rbp), %eax
movl -4(%rbp), %edx
leal 1(%rdx), %ecx
movl %eax, %edx
movl %ecx, %esi
movl $753666, %edi
call write_memory
nop
leave
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE2:
.size write_frame_buffer_cell, .-write_frame_buffer_cell
.globl main
.type main, @function
main:
.LFB3:
.cfi_startproc
pushq %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 16
.cfi_offset 6, -16
movq %rsp, %rbp
.cfi_def_cfa_register 6
subq $16, %rsp
movl $1, %esi
movl $0, %edi
call frame_buffer_offset
movl %eax, -4(%rbp)
movl -4(%rbp), %eax
movl $65, %edx
movl %eax, %esi
movl $753666, %edi
call write_memory
movl -4(%rbp), %eax
addl $1, %eax
movl $7, %edx
movl %eax, %esi
movl $753666, %edi
call write_memory
movl $0, %ecx
movl $1, %edx
movl $7, %esi
movl $66, %edi
call write_frame_buffer_cell
nop
leave
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 8
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE3:
.size main, .-main
.ident "GCC: (Ubuntu 6.2.0-3ubuntu11~16.04) 6.2.0 20160901"
.section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
回答1:
I can reproduce your exact output if the code is modified to be:
unsigned int offset = frame_buffer_offset(0, 1);
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset, 'A');
write_memory(FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS, offset + 1, GREY_ON_BLACK);
write_frame_buffer_cell('B', GREY_ON_BLACK, 1, 0);
The difference being in the last line ('B', GREY_ON_BLACK, 1, 0);. Originally you had ('B', GREY_ON_BLACK, 0, 1); . This is in line with what you described you were trying to do when you said:
I've taken a screen shot of the output that I am getting. I expect 'A' to appear in the 0th column of the 1st row and for 'B' to appear on the 1st column of the 0th row.
I gather you may have posted the wrong code in this question. This is the output I get:
It seems you are new to OS development. Your bootloader code only places the CPU into 32-bit protected mode, but to run a 64-bit kernel you need to be in 64-bit longmode. If you are just getting started I'd suggest falling back to writing a 32-bit kernel for purposes of learning at this early stage. At the bottom I have a 64-bit long mode section with a link to a longmode tutorial that could be used to modify your bootloader to run 64-bit code.
Primary Issue Causing Unusual Behaviour
You are experiencing an issue primarily related to the fact that you are generating 64-bit code with GCC but you are running it in 32-bit protected mode according to your bootloader code. 64-bit code generation running in 32-bit protected mode may appear to execute, but it will do it incorrectly. In simple OSes where you are simply displaying to the video display you may often see unexpected output as a side effect. Your program could triple fault the machine, but you got unlucky that the side effect seemed to display something on the video display. You may have been under the false impression that things were working as they should when they really weren't.
This question is somewhat similar to another Stackoverflow question. After the original poster of that question made available a complete example it became clear that it was his issue. Part of my answer to him to resolve the issue was as follows:
Likely Cause of Undefined Behavior
After all the code and the make file were made available in EDIT 2 it became clear that one significant problem was that most of the code was compiled and linked to 64-bit objects and executables. That code won't work in 32-bit protected mode.
In the make file make these adjustments:
- When compiling with GCC you need to add
-m32option- When assembling with GNU Assembler (as) targeting 32-bit objects you need to use
--32- When linking with LD you need to add the
-melf_i386option- When assembling with NASM targeting 32-bit objects you need to change
-f elf64to-f elf32
With that in mind you can alter your Makefile to generate 32-bit code. It could look like:
bootloader.bin: bootloader.asm
nasm -f bin bootloader.asm -o bootloader.bin
bootkernel.o: bootkernel.asm
nasm -f elf32 bootkernel.asm -o bootkernel.o
kernel.o: kernel.c
gcc-6 -m32 -Wextra -Wall -ffreestanding -c kernel.c -o kernel.o
kernel.bin: bootkernel.o kernel.o linker.ld
ld -melf_i386 -o kernel.bin -T linker.ld bootkernel.o kernel.o --oformat binary
os-image: bootloader.bin kernel.bin
cat bootloader.bin kernel.bin > os-image
qemu: os-image
qemu-system-x86_64 -d guest_errors -fda os-image -boot a
I gather when you started having issues with your code you ended up trying 0xb8002 as the address for your video memory. It should be 0xb8000. You'll need to modify:
#define FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS 0xb8002
To be:
#define FRAME_BUFFER_ADDRESS 0xb8000
Making all these changes should resolve your issues. This is what the output I got looked like after the changes mentioned above:
Other observations
In write_memory you use:
unsigned char * memory = (unsigned char *) address;
Since you are using 0xb8000 that is memory mapped to the video display you should mark it as volatile since a compiler could optimize things away not knowing that there is a side effect to writing to that memory (namely displaying characters on a display). You might wish to use:
volatile unsigned char * memory = (unsigned char *) address;
In your bootloader.asm You really should explicitly set the A20 line on. You can find information about doing that in this OSDev Wiki article. The status of the A20 line at the point a bootloader starts executing may vary between emulators. Failure to set it on could cause issues if you try to access memory areas on an odd numbered megabyte boundary (like 0x100000 to 0x1fffff, 0x300000 to 0x1fffff etc). Accesses to the odd numbered megabyte memory regions will actually read data from the even numbered memory region just below it. This is usually not behaviour you want.
64-bit long mode
If you want to run 64-bit code you will need to place the processor into 64-bit long mode. This is a bit more involved than entering 32-bit protected mode. Information on 64-bit longmode can be found in the OSDev wiki. Once properly in 64-bit longmode you can use 64-bit instructions generated by GCC.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43477719/why-does-passing-a-char-to-a-function-change-its-value-in-c