问题
YUI Compressor was the consensus best tool for minimizing, but Closure seems like it could be better.
回答1:
"Whichever you find best for you" I think is the general answer at the moment - YUI has been available longer so undoubtedly will be the one which currently has the consensus as being the best tool. Whereas Closure is new to us - so there isn't the wealth of experience with Closure as there is with YUI. Hence I don't think you'd find a compelling real-world arguments of why to use Closure based on people's experiences with it simply because it's new.
That's not to say you shouldn't use Closure....just my round about way of saying, I don't think there's an answer available to this until a number of people have used the 2 and compared them.
Edit:
There are a couple of early comparisons, saying Closure does give an improvement:
http://blog.feedly.com/2009/11/06/google-closure-vs-yui-min/
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=924426
Further Edit: Worth keeping an eye on issue list for Closure: http://code.google.com/p/closure-compiler/issues/list
回答2:
From the comparisons I've seen, Closure seems to be the clear winner in terms of minimizing file size. This article uses three popular JS libraries (jQuery, Prototype, MooTools) to compare compression between YUI Compressor and Closure Compiler: http://www.bloggingdeveloper.com/post/Closure-Compiler-vs-YUI-Compressor-Comparing-the-Javascript-Compression-Tools.aspx
Closure comes out in front in each test, particularly in its advanced mode, where it "minimizes code size about 20-25% more than YUI Compressor by providing nearly 60% compression."
回答3:
Closure can be used in the Simple mode or the Advanced mode. Simple mode is fairly safe for most JavaScript code, as it only renames local variables in functions to get further compression.
Advanced mode is much more aggressive. It will rename keys in object literals, and inline function calls if it can determine that they return simple values with no side effects.
For example:
function Foo()
{
return "hello";
}
alert(Foo());
is translated to:
alert("hello");
And this code:
var o = {First: "Mike", Last: "Koss"};
alert(o);
is translated to:
alert({a:"Mike",b:"Koss"});
You can prevent the Advanced mode from changing key values in object literals by quoting the names like this:
{'First': "Mike", 'Last': "Koss"}
You can try out these and other examples at google's interactive Closure Compiler site.
回答4:
Looks like jQuery 1.5 just moved to UglifyJS:
Additionally with this switch we’ve moved to using UglifyJS from the Google Closure Compiler. We’ve seen some solid file size improvements while using it so we’re quite pleased with the switch.
回答5:
I think it depends on your code. If you want to compile your own code, then I think it is worth it to patch the code so that it works with Closure Compiler (some things might seem a bit awkward at the start). I believe Closure Compiler soon will be the top choice for such jobs and it will also make you to tidy up your code a bit and maintain consistent style (of course it depends on your preferences, you might hate some parts, I do :P ).
If you depend on other libraries then in my opinion you should wait a bit until they release Closure Compiler compatible versions. It shouldn't take much time for most popular libraries out there. And maybe you can provide fixes for those "not-so-active" libraries which you use yourself.
I'm talking about Advanced Compilation mode here, the Simple Compilation mode as some has pointed out is fairly safe to use.
And here's a different opinion - Google Closure ? I'm Not Impressed. It's maybe a little bit too harsh, but nice read. I guess only time will tell which one is better =)
回答6:
As of october 2012, looks like YUI compressor is now deprecated, or at least no longer going to be used in YUI: http://www.yuiblog.com/blog/2012/10/16/state-of-yui-compressor/
回答7:
You can make some tests here, and see what is better in each browser: http://jsperf.com/closure-vs-yui
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1686428/should-i-use-the-yui-compressor-or-the-new-google-closure-compiler-to-compress-m