问题
In ASP.NET MVC 5 you could throw a HttpException with a HTTP code and this would set the response like so:
throw new HttpException((int)HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "Bad Request.");
HttpException
does not exist in ASP.NET Core. What is the equivalent code?
回答1:
I implemented my own HttpException
and supporting middleware which catches all HttpException
's and turns them into the corresponding error response. A short extract can be seen below. You can also use the Boxed.AspNetCore Nuget package.
Usage Example in Startup.cs
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder application)
{
application.UseIISPlatformHandler();
application.UseStatusCodePagesWithReExecute("/error/{0}");
application.UseHttpException();
application.UseMvc();
}
Extension Method
public static class ApplicationBuilderExtensions
{
public static IApplicationBuilder UseHttpException(this IApplicationBuilder application)
{
return application.UseMiddleware<HttpExceptionMiddleware>();
}
}
Middleware
internal class HttpExceptionMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
public HttpExceptionMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
this.next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await this.next.Invoke(context);
}
catch (HttpException httpException)
{
context.Response.StatusCode = httpException.StatusCode;
var responseFeature = context.Features.Get<IHttpResponseFeature>();
responseFeature.ReasonPhrase = httpException.Message;
}
}
}
HttpException
public class HttpException : Exception
{
private readonly int httpStatusCode;
public HttpException(int httpStatusCode)
{
this.httpStatusCode = httpStatusCode;
}
public HttpException(HttpStatusCode httpStatusCode)
{
this.httpStatusCode = (int)httpStatusCode;
}
public HttpException(int httpStatusCode, string message) : base(message)
{
this.httpStatusCode = httpStatusCode;
}
public HttpException(HttpStatusCode httpStatusCode, string message) : base(message)
{
this.httpStatusCode = (int)httpStatusCode;
}
public HttpException(int httpStatusCode, string message, Exception inner) : base(message, inner)
{
this.httpStatusCode = httpStatusCode;
}
public HttpException(HttpStatusCode httpStatusCode, string message, Exception inner) : base(message, inner)
{
this.httpStatusCode = (int)httpStatusCode;
}
public int StatusCode { get { return this.httpStatusCode; } }
}
In the long term, I would advise against using exceptions for returning errors. Exceptions are slower than just returning an error from a method.
回答2:
After a brief chat with @davidfowl, it seems that ASP.NET 5 has no such notion of HttpException
or HttpResponseException
that "magically" turn to response messages.
What you can do, is hook into the ASP.NET 5 pipeline via MiddleWare, and create one that handles the exceptions for you.
Here is an example from the source code of their error handler middleware which will set the response status code to 500 in case of an exception further up the pipeline:
public class ErrorHandlerMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
private readonly ErrorHandlerOptions _options;
private readonly ILogger _logger;
public ErrorHandlerMiddleware(RequestDelegate next,
ILoggerFactory loggerFactory,
ErrorHandlerOptions options)
{
_next = next;
_options = options;
_logger = loggerFactory.CreateLogger<ErrorHandlerMiddleware>();
if (_options.ErrorHandler == null)
{
_options.ErrorHandler = _next;
}
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
try
{
await _next(context);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
_logger.LogError("An unhandled exception has occurred: " + ex.Message, ex);
if (context.Response.HasStarted)
{
_logger.LogWarning("The response has already started,
the error handler will not be executed.");
throw;
}
PathString originalPath = context.Request.Path;
if (_options.ErrorHandlingPath.HasValue)
{
context.Request.Path = _options.ErrorHandlingPath;
}
try
{
var errorHandlerFeature = new ErrorHandlerFeature()
{
Error = ex,
};
context.SetFeature<IErrorHandlerFeature>(errorHandlerFeature);
context.Response.StatusCode = 500;
context.Response.Headers.Clear();
await _options.ErrorHandler(context);
return;
}
catch (Exception ex2)
{
_logger.LogError("An exception was thrown attempting
to execute the error handler.", ex2);
}
finally
{
context.Request.Path = originalPath;
}
throw; // Re-throw the original if we couldn't handle it
}
}
}
And you need to register it with StartUp.cs
:
public class Startup
{
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app,
IHostingEnvironment env,
ILoggerFactory loggerfactory)
{
app.UseMiddleWare<ExceptionHandlerMiddleware>();
}
}
回答3:
Alternatively, if you just want to return an arbitrary status code and aren't concerned with the Exception-based approach, you can use
return new HttpStatusCodeResult(400);
Update: as of .NET Core RC 2, the Http prefix is dropped. It is now:
return new StatusCodeResult(400);
回答4:
The Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.Controller
base class exposes a HttpBadRequest(string)
overload which takes an error message to return to the client. So from within a controller action, you could call:
return HttpBadRequest("Bad Request.");
Ultimately my nose says any private methods called from within a controller action should either be fully http-context-aware and return an IActionResult
, or perform some other small task completely isolated from the fact that it's inside of an http pipeline. Granted this is my personal opinion, but a class that performs some piece of business logic should not be returning HTTP status codes, and instead should be throwing its own exceptions which can be caught and translated at the controller/action level.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31054012/asp-net-core-equivalent-of-asp-net-mvc-5s-httpexception