问题
I am confused about the post ++ and pre ++ operator , for example in the following code
int x = 10;
x = x++;
sysout(x);
will print 10 ?
It prints 10,but I expected it should print 11
but when I do
x = ++x; instead of x = x++;
it will print eleven as I expected , so why does x = x++; doesn't change the the value of x ?
回答1:
No, the printout of 10 is correct. The key to understanding the reason behind the result is the difference between pre-increment ++x
and post-increment x++
compound assignments. When you use pre-increment, the value of the expression is taken after performing the increment. When you use post-increment, though, the value of the expression is taken before incrementing, and stored for later use, after the result of incrementing is written back into the variable.
Here is the sequence of events that leads to what you see:
x
is assigned10
- Because of
++
in post-increment position, the current value ofx
(i.e.10
) is stored for later use - New value of
11
is stored intox
- The temporary value of
10
is stored back intox
, writing right over11
that has been stored there.
回答2:
Post Increment(n++) : First execute the statement then increase the value by one.
Pre Increment (++n) : First increase the value by one then execute the statement.
Example:
class IncrementTest{
public static void main(String[] args){
System.out.println("***Post increment test***");
int n = 10;
System.out.println(n); // output 10
System.out.println(n++); // output 10
System.out.println(n); // output 11
System.out.println("***Pre increment test***");
int m = 10;
System.out.println(m); // output 10
System.out.println(++m); // output 11
System.out.println(m); // output 11
}
}
回答3:
Quoting from The Java tutorials - Assignment, Arithmetic, and Unary Operators:
The increment/decrement operators can be applied before (prefix) or after (postfix) the operand. The code
result++;
and++result;
will both end in result being incremented by one. The only difference is that the prefix version (++result
) evaluates to the incremented value, whereas the postfix version (result++
) evaluates to the original value. If you are just performing a simple increment/decrement, it doesn't really matter which version you choose. But if you use this operator in part of a larger expression, the one that you choose may make a significant difference.
回答4:
I also stumbled by the trickiness of post-increment operator while preparing for a Java certification exam. Most, even the experienced, think post-increment (++) operator increments the variable after the execution of the statement, just as @bartektartanus stated above. This thinking is good enough for most real world coding, but breaks down if a post/pre-incremented/decremented variable occurs more than once within a statement. Looks like the so-called interview/knowledge test questions promptly check for this loose assumption. It is worth breaking this up. The accepted answer above is not so helpful for a concise, logical mnemonic.
public class Test {
static int x = 10;
public static void main(String[] args) {
print(x++);
}
private static void print(int x) {
System.out.println(x);
System.out.println(Test.x);
}
}
Output
10
11
Per the common assumption, the static variable x would be incremented after completion of the call to the print
method. But when checked inside the method, it has already been incremented. So, post- increment, decrement operaters submit the variable value to the method or operator to which they are parameters, and increment/decrement the associated variable immediately before the operator/method gets executed. The pre-increment/decrement operation is somewhat less confusing, but again even this happens per method or operator, not the whole statement.
// The OP
int x = 10;
x = x++; // x = 10. x does get incremented but before the assignment operation
int x = 10;
x = x++ + x; // x = 21. x got incremented immediately after the addition operator grabbed its value.
回答5:
I have not found a reference in JLS, so this answer is predicated on the speculation that you are not invoking undefined behavior, because this is Java.
x = x++; // Assign the old value of `x` to x, before increment.
x = ++x; // Assign the new value of `x` to x, after increment.
This is the based on the definition of postfix and prefix operators.
回答6:
When you do this:
x = x++;
It actually is translated to "Assign 'x' to 'x' and then increment 'x' by one".
Whereas in this case:
x = ++x;
It gets translated to "Increment 'x' by one, then assign it to 'x'".
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24564603/java-increment-and-assignment-operator