zend-optimizer | 易学教程

Decode a PHP encoded with 'zend guard'

阅读更多关于 Decode a PHP encoded with 'zend guard'

问题 We have a website maintained by an old employee and it appears it's encoded by Zend Guard including all backups. I know a little about Zend Optimizer, but never considered it for source protection as I know in the end the bytecode will need to be decoded for the interpreter, and was sure people easily decode optimized files using some software. Now I need to decode some files and I can't find anything but some 'paid services'. We have the ownership of the code and are locked out now for any

PHP Opcode Caching/Zend Acceleration and include_once vs. require_once

阅读更多关于 PHP Opcode Caching/Zend Acceleration and include_once vs. require_once

I have a colleague who is looking into opcode caching/Zend Acceleration (I've always assumed these are the same thing) for our PHP based application. His Benchmarks appear to indicate that we're NOT seeing a performance benefit if we include our (large) class libraries with require_once, but we DO see the performance benefit when using include_once. This smells fishy to both of us, but I don't have time to check into our benchmark methodology myself and my colleague has more tolerance for the smell of fish than I do. :) Has anyone ever run into anything like this? If not, any thoughts on other

PHP Opcode Caching/Zend Acceleration and include_once vs. require_once

阅读更多关于 PHP Opcode Caching/Zend Acceleration and include_once vs. require_once

问题 I have a colleague who is looking into opcode caching/Zend Acceleration (I've always assumed these are the same thing) for our PHP based application. His Benchmarks appear to indicate that we're NOT seeing a performance benefit if we include our (large) class libraries with require_once, but we DO see the performance benefit when using include_once. This smells fishy to both of us, but I don't have time to check into our benchmark methodology myself and my colleague has more tolerance for the