virtual-dom | 易学教程

How to detect rerenders in React JS correctly?

阅读更多关于 How to detect rerenders in React JS correctly?

问题 Let's say we have a parent component and multiple functional child components. I want to clearly know if the parent re-renders does the child re-renders or not. After going through a few articles I came to know there are 3 ways we can detect rerenders. (Let me know if there are more ways.) 1. Put a console.log in the child component. 2. Use Chrome paint flashing option in the settings. 3. Use React dev tool Do all these ways are correct to know if the component really rerenders? Because it

React系列——React主要内容简介

阅读更多关于 React系列——React主要内容简介

React 主要有四个主要内容构成，下面分别来介绍一下：第1章 1、 Virtual DOM 1.1、虚拟 DOM 是 React 的基石。之所以引入虚拟 DOM ，一方面是性能的考虑。 Web 应用和网站不同，一个 Web 应用中通常会在单页内有大量的 DOM 操作，而这些 DOM 操作很慢。在 React 中，应用程序在虚拟 DOM 上操作，这让 React 有了优化的机会。简单说， React 在每次需要渲染时，会先比较当前 DOM 内容和待渲染内容的差异，然后再决定如何最优地更新 DOM 。这个过程被称为 reconciliation 。除了性能的考虑， React 引入虚拟 DOM 更重要的意义是提供了一种一致的开发方式来开发服务端应用、 Web 应用和手机端应用：因为有了虚拟 DOM 这一层，所以通过配备不同的渲染器，就可以将虚拟 DOM 的内容渲染到不同的平台。而应用开发者，使用 JavaScript 就可以通吃各个平台了。相当棒的思路！ 1.2 、Virtual DOM 速度快的说明在Web开发中，我们总需要将变化的数据实时反应到UI上，这时就需要对DOM进行操作。而复杂或频繁的DOM操作通常是性能瓶颈产生的原因（如何进行高性能的复杂DOM操作通常是衡量一个前端开发人员技能的重要指标）。React为此引入了虚拟DOM（Virtual DOM

Render Maquette without the Projector

阅读更多关于 Render Maquette without the Projector

问题 I want to use Maquette as a basic hyperscript language. Consequently, I don't want to use the maquette.projector . However, I'm having a hard time getting any of the maquette.dom functions to work. var h = maquette.h; var dom = maquette.dom; var svg = h('div.sweet', [ h('svg', [ h('circle', { cx: '2cm', cy: '2cm', r: '4cm', fill: 'red' }), ]) ]); document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () { console.log(svg); var root = dom.create(svg).domNode; }); <script src="//cdnjs

react event target parent node

阅读更多关于 react event target parent node

问题 Is it possible to get the event target's parent node on the virtual DOM? In my basic react component I have a method which is triggered from onClick event, I would like to get the parent virtual DOM node properties. handleClick(e){ // The following code only gives me the actual DOM parent Node ReactDOM.findDOMNode(e.target).parentNode } 回答1: Yes. React works on a virtual DOM model, and will update the real Browser DOM only if needed. The events in React work on a virtual DOM also and they are

In React do ref's reference the virtual DOM, or the actual DOM?

阅读更多关于 In React do ref's reference the virtual DOM, or the actual DOM?

问题 I'm assuming the virtual DOM, and that React takes care of it with diff'ing. But I had a recruiter say that ref's affect the actual DOM, I can't see how this can be. I assume that they were just mistaken. 回答1: Refs should reference the actual DOM. One usage of Refs is integrating with third-party DOM libraries, so you can directly modify the DOM using Refs. If Refs reference the virtual DOM, I don't think the demand can be meet. You modify a virtual DOM, but you can't make sure the

Is Shadow DOM fast like Virtual DOM in React.js?

阅读更多关于 Is Shadow DOM fast like Virtual DOM in React.js?

问题 Does implementing Shadow DOM in my projects will make them faster like virtual DOM that's used by React? 回答1: Virtual DOM Virtual DOM is about avoiding unnecessary changes to the DOM, which are expensive performance-wise, because changes to the DOM usually cause re-rendering of the page. Virtual DOM also allows to collect several changes to be applied at once, so not every single change causes a re-render, but instead re-rendering only happens once after a set of changes was applied to the

Why is React's concept of Virtual DOM said to be more performant than dirty model checking?

阅读更多关于 Why is React's concept of Virtual DOM said to be more performant than dirty model checking?

问题 I saw a React dev talk at (Pete Hunt: React: Rethinking best practices -- JSConf EU 2013) and the speaker mentioned that dirty-checking of the model can be slow. But isn't calculating the diff between virtual DOMs actually even less performant since the virtual DOM, in most of the cases, should be bigger than model? I really like the potential power of the Virtual DOM (especially server-side rendering) but I would like to know all the pros and cons. 回答1: I'm the primary author of a virtual

Vue.js components internal state being reused when underlying data changes

阅读更多关于 Vue.js components internal state being reused when underlying data changes

问题 I am working on a medium size web application based on vue.js. I've been facing several virtual DOM issues mostly related to vue instances life cycle. The following code snippet (jsFiddle also available here) demonstrates some of these problems. The test-component vue component receives a property value and updates its internal state using that value. Whenever the data set changes (by sorting or by new data), the properties are updated, but the internal state is not. This is pretty easy to

Vue.js components internal state being reused when underlying data changes

阅读更多关于 Vue.js components internal state being reused when underlying data changes

Does Angular 2 use Shadow DOM or a Virtual DOM?

阅读更多关于 Does Angular 2 use Shadow DOM or a Virtual DOM?

问题 What does Angular 2 use to update the DOM. Is it Shadow DOM or Virtual DOM ? Was there any such concept in Angular 1? 回答1: Angular2 doesn't use shadow DOM (default) nor virtual DOM . With encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.Emulated (default) there is no shadow DOM because style encapsulation is only emulated. encapsulation: ViewEncapsulation.Native enables shadow DOM on browsers that support it natively or it's again emulated when the webcomponents polyfill is loaded. Shadow DOM is also not