transactionscope

问题 Based on this article here as well as the question: Difference Between Transaction and TransactionScope we know that TransactionScope The TransactionScope class provides a simple way to mark a block of code as participating in a transaction, without requiring you to interact with the transaction itself. A transaction scope can select and manage the ambient transaction automatically. Due to its ease of use and efficiency, it is recommended that you use the TransactionScope class when

问题 EF Core 2.1 introduced support for ambient transactions. The sample creates a new SqlConnection , manually opens it and passes it to the DbContext : using (var scope = new TransactionScope( TransactionScopeOption.Required, new TransactionOptions { IsolationLevel = IsolationLevel.ReadCommitted })) { var connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString); connection.Open(); try { // Run raw ADO.NET command in the transaction var command = connection.CreateCommand(); command.CommandText = "DELETE

问题 As per my understanding, C# TransactionScope can still work when wrapping a T-SQL BEGIN / COMMIT TRANSACTION inside a stored procedure. I have the following C# method which does EF Save first, then call a stored procedure that has its own transaction and then call external service over HTTP public async Task DoSomething(MyDto dto) { using (var scope = new TransactionScope()) { //Save First var myEntity = await _dbContext.MyEntity.Where(x=>x.Id == dto.Id).SingleOtDefaultAsync(); // Assign

问题 As per my understanding, C# TransactionScope can still work when wrapping a T-SQL BEGIN / COMMIT TRANSACTION inside a stored procedure. I have the following C# method which does EF Save first, then call a stored procedure that has its own transaction and then call external service over HTTP public async Task DoSomething(MyDto dto) { using (var scope = new TransactionScope()) { //Save First var myEntity = await _dbContext.MyEntity.Where(x=>x.Id == dto.Id).SingleOtDefaultAsync(); // Assign

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26298271/problems-with-transactionscope-and-servicebus-in-production-environment

来源： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26298271/problems-with-transactionscope-and-servicebus-in-production-environment

问题 The current implementation of TransactionScope lacks the ability to change IsolationLevels in nested scopes. MSDN states: When using nested TransactionScope objects, all nested scopes must be configured to use exactly the same isolation level if they want to join the ambient transaction. If a nested TransactionScope object tries to join the ambient transaction yet it specifies a different isolation level, an ArgumentException is thrown. However SQL Server allows us to change Isolation Levels

问题 I have some main table (like Companies) and a lot of dependent tables (like CompanyAddresses, CompanyPaymentInfos, etc.) in my Postgres DB: CREATE TABLE Companies ( Id uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, ...); CREATE TABLE CompanyAddresses( CompanyId uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES Companies(Id), ...); CREATE TABLE CompanyPaymentInfos( CompanyId uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES Companies(Id), ...); I use transactions from standard library in my C# code: private TransactionScope

问题 I have some main table (like Companies) and a lot of dependent tables (like CompanyAddresses, CompanyPaymentInfos, etc.) in my Postgres DB: CREATE TABLE Companies ( Id uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, ...); CREATE TABLE CompanyAddresses( CompanyId uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES Companies(Id), ...); CREATE TABLE CompanyPaymentInfos( CompanyId uuid NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES Companies(Id), ...); I use transactions from standard library in my C# code: private TransactionScope

问题 Following is Async Cache and Database update using Transaction Scope. I cannot use TransactionScopeAsyncFlowOption.Enabled introduced in the v 4.5.1, since the Apache Ignite.Net Cache I am using doesn't support it. I have tried finding a workaround by capturing the current Synchronization Context and then explicitly using Synchronization Context Send method to complete the transaction, but this doesn't work as I still get an error Transaction scope must be disposed on same thread it was