threadcontext

ExecutionContext of Threads

痞子三分冷 提交于 2020-01-13 09:14:14
问题 What's the purpose of ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow(); ? In the following code what exactly gets suppressed? I've this test code... protected void btnSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Thread[] th = new Thread[100]; Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = new System.Globalization.CultureInfo("en-GB"); AsyncFlowControl cntrl = ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow(); for (int i = 0; i < th.Length; i++) { th[i] = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(ThreadMethod)); th[i].Name = "Thread #" + (i

Teaching gdb to understand micro-threads from core files

走远了吗. 提交于 2019-12-24 01:24:52
问题 I am working on a huge program that employs a (custom built) micro-threading solution. It sometimes happens that I need debug a crash. During such times, it is useful to be able to switch from one micro-thread to another. If I'm doing live debugging, I can replace all of the registers to those that came from the micro-thread context. I have written a macro to do just that, and it works really well. The problem is that I cannot change the register values if I am doing post-mortem debugging

How can we create a callcontext for async .net methods?

久未见 提交于 2019-12-13 18:33:55
问题 In a synchronous environment, it is easy to create a scoped context which allows you to attach out-of-band context to your current thread. Examples of this are the current TransactionScope or thread-static logging context. using (new MyContext(5)) Assert.Equal(5, MyContext.Current); Assert.Equal(null, MyContext.Current); It is easy to implement the context using a combination of IDisposable and a thread-static field. Obviously, this falls apart when using async methods, because the context is

Unable to create multiple log files based on the ThreadContext map values using routing appender in log4j2

纵然是瞬间 提交于 2019-12-13 06:14:13
问题 I'm using the log4j2 jars in the oracle adf application build on 12c. Requirement: Create multiple log files based on the session and ability to change the logging properties dynamically. Log4j2.xml file <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <Configuration status="trace" packages="apps.adfAppUI.ui.bean"> <Appenders> <File name="file" fileName="./adfAppCustomLogs/TestLog4j2.log"> <PatternLayout> <Pattern>%d{YYYY-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5level %class %L %M - %msg%xEx%n</Pattern> </PatternLayout>

Can we set the characters limited to 10 characters in log4net %property?

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2019-12-13 01:05:18
问题 This is my threadContext exception message property log4net.ThreadContext.Properties["excmessage"] = ex.Message; I want to get the first 10 characters of exception message property using log4net. This is the line in Log4net.config: %property{excmessage} 回答1: As far as I can tell you can only "truncate from the beginning" which means you get the end of the string: %.10property{excmessage} Here is a link to the documentation: http://logging.apache.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.11/release/sdk/log4net

ExecutionContext of Threads

自闭症网瘾萝莉.ら 提交于 2019-12-05 04:33:48
What's the purpose of ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow(); ? In the following code what exactly gets suppressed? I've this test code... protected void btnSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { Thread[] th = new Thread[100]; Thread.CurrentThread.CurrentCulture = new System.Globalization.CultureInfo("en-GB"); AsyncFlowControl cntrl = ExecutionContext.SuppressFlow(); for (int i = 0; i < th.Length; i++) { th[i] = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(ThreadMethod)); th[i].Name = "Thread #" + (i+1).ToString(); th[i].Start((i+1).ToString()); } ExecutionContext.RestoreFlow(); foreach (Thread t in

Why Thread.CurrentContext property and Thread.GetDomain() method?

半腔热情 提交于 2019-12-05 01:11:42
问题 It's not a question of major importance, but I was wondering why the Thread class exposes a property for getting the current Context ( Thread.CurrentContext ) and a method for getting the current AppDomain ( Thread.GetDomain() ). Knowing the hierarchy of Process > AppDomain > Context > Thread, my assumption would be that the context for thread is known at current point in time, and the domain needs to be searched based on current context. But I'd like to hear wiser answers. Thanks! 回答1: my

Why Thread.CurrentContext property and Thread.GetDomain() method?

丶灬走出姿态 提交于 2019-12-03 16:43:00
It's not a question of major importance, but I was wondering why the Thread class exposes a property for getting the current Context ( Thread.CurrentContext ) and a method for getting the current AppDomain ( Thread.GetDomain() ). Knowing the hierarchy of Process > AppDomain > Context > Thread, my assumption would be that the context for thread is known at current point in time, and the domain needs to be searched based on current context. But I'd like to hear wiser answers. Thanks! my assumption would be that the context for thread is known at current point in time, and the domain needs to be

Windows: avoid pushing full x86 context on stack

萝らか妹 提交于 2019-11-27 20:42:21
I have implemented PARLANSE , a language under MS Windows that uses cactus stacks to implement parallel programs. The stack chunks are allocated on a per-function basis and are just the right size to handle local variables, expression temp pushes/pops, and calls to libraries (including stack space for the library routines to work in). Such stack frames can be as small as 32 bytes in practice and often are. This all works great unless the code does something stupid and causes a hardware trap... at which point Windows appears to insist on pushing the entire x86 machine context "on the stack".

Windows: avoid pushing full x86 context on stack

最后都变了- 提交于 2019-11-26 22:58:02
问题 I have implemented PARLANSE, a language under MS Windows that uses cactus stacks to implement parallel programs. The stack chunks are allocated on a per-function basis and are just the right size to handle local variables, expression temp pushes/pops, and calls to libraries (including stack space for the library routines to work in). Such stack frames can be as small as 32 bytes in practice and often are. This all works great unless the code does something stupid and causes a hardware trap...