svn

问题 How do popular version control systems (svn, git) handle storing revisions to a binary document? I have projects with binary sources that are periodically updated and need to be checked in (mostly Photoshop documents, custom data format and a few word processing documents). I've always been worried about checking in the binaries because I thought that the VCS might take a simple route of simply uploading a new copy of the binary each time - and hence my repository would get huge quickly. If I

问题 How do popular version control systems (svn, git) handle storing revisions to a binary document? I have projects with binary sources that are periodically updated and need to be checked in (mostly Photoshop documents, custom data format and a few word processing documents). I've always been worried about checking in the binaries because I thought that the VCS might take a simple route of simply uploading a new copy of the binary each time - and hence my repository would get huge quickly. If I

问题 How do popular version control systems (svn, git) handle storing revisions to a binary document? I have projects with binary sources that are periodically updated and need to be checked in (mostly Photoshop documents, custom data format and a few word processing documents). I've always been worried about checking in the binaries because I thought that the VCS might take a simple route of simply uploading a new copy of the binary each time - and hence my repository would get huge quickly. If I

问题 In my project we have to use maben-build-number plugin to construct the final name of the jar, for that purpose we use the revision of the SCN, so we need SCM But we have two SVN on controlled environment without direct access and on our local test environment, so for our pouproses we have to use: <scm> <connection>scm:svn:http://dev.com/svn_repo/trunk</connection> <developerConnection>scm:svn:https://dev.com/svn_repo/trunk</developerConnection> <url>http://dev.com/view.cvs</url> </scm> But

问题 Anybody know what the "proper" mime-type for patch files would be? I have been using application/octet-stream because I don't see anything better at iana.org. Is application/octet-stream correct, or is there something else that fits better? Why is there no application/patch type? Obviously, one possible answer is text/plain , but I have seen many patch files which include data which is not purely text. Is text/plain the best choice if you know for a fact all content is text, or is it better

问题 I have a SVN working copy (managed by TortoiseSVN). In that working copy I use git for local version control and branching. Of course, I want to hide the .git directory and .gitignore file for svn. However, ignoring them means adding a property to the repository which is no longer local. I don't want that (as many people share this repo) as it is annoying since it is proposed to be committed on each commit to the repo. I found (via that question) the possibility of the ignore-on-commit list.

问题 I have a SVN working copy (managed by TortoiseSVN). In that working copy I use git for local version control and branching. Of course, I want to hide the .git directory and .gitignore file for svn. However, ignoring them means adding a property to the repository which is no longer local. I don't want that (as many people share this repo) as it is annoying since it is proposed to be committed on each commit to the repo. I found (via that question) the possibility of the ignore-on-commit list.

问题 I have a SVN working copy (managed by TortoiseSVN). In that working copy I use git for local version control and branching. Of course, I want to hide the .git directory and .gitignore file for svn. However, ignoring them means adding a property to the repository which is no longer local. I don't want that (as many people share this repo) as it is annoying since it is proposed to be committed on each commit to the repo. I found (via that question) the possibility of the ignore-on-commit list.

问题 I am looking to migrate my codebase from svn to git. There are too many branches in my svn repo. I only wish to clone couple of branches and merge them together and push it to git. I want to avoid cloning all branches as it takes long time. How do I achieve this? After it's done, I want to periodically get update from those svn branches, merge them and update the git repo and the svn will be active for certain period of time. It would be waste of time if I have to clone it again. Is there a

问题 Since git users can config their user.name and user.email freely and do commits, it's possible for John to fake a commit with Bob's name and email, which is not what we want. Is there any way to prevent this? I know in svn we need username and password to commit; is there any equivalent mechanism in Git? 回答1: Some convoluted solutions are possible, I guess: Require an SSH account to access a repository; create one repository per authorized user. Create hooks in every repository that rewrite