stdcall

I know that __stdcall functions can't have ellipses, but I want to be sure there are no platforms that support the stdarg.h functions for calling conventions other than __cdecl or __stdcall. The calling convention has to be one where the caller clears the arguments from the stack (because the callee doesn't know what will be passed). That doesn't necessarily correspond to what Microsoft calls "__cdecl" though. Just for example, on a SPARC, it'll normally pass the arguments in registers, because that's how the SPARC is designed to work -- its registers basically act as a call stack that gets

I'm writing some plugin code in a dll that is called by a host over which I have no control. The host assumes that the plugins are exported as __stdcall functions. The host is told the name of the function and the details of the arguments that it expects and dynamically crufts up a call to it via LoadLibrary, GetProcAddress and manually pushing the arguments onto the stack. Usually plugin dlls expose a constant interface. My plugin exposes an interface that is configured at dll load time. To achieve this my plugin exposes a set of standard entry points that are defined at the time the dll is

I'm trying to develop understanding of Assembly language. I understand that when function creates stack frame, it pushes current EBP , than copies stack pointer value to the EBP . First (and only) function parameter is accessed by EBP + 8 . But why 8? Next value after pushed EBP is logically offset 4. I read many webpages, but it seems I don't understand this part. The "missing" DWORD is the return address. The call stack looks like: ebp : saved ebp ebp + 4 : return address ebp + 8 : pushed parameter And then if the function uses local variables, since stack space is (typically) reserved for

I'm working on my own kernel using GCC, and when calling C functions from asm code, I have to do add esp,xx myself. After some searching I found that stdcall is a Microsoft invention and can't use it in GCC. Is there any handy way to do this work? Is there any equivalence of stdcall in linux? my kernel in a linux environment Wait, is this your own kernel, or the Linux kernel? Because if it's your own kernel, it's not Linux any more. If you're working on Linux, you'll want to stick with regular calling conventions and write your assembly to match. If you're working on your own kernel, you can

I'm trying to port a Windows app to Linux. This appplication marks some functions with the __stdcall attribute. However, i was told by a friend that stdcall is used only on windows and has no meaning in linux (but DOES exist in Windows GCC). I tried to search Google about that, and got some results state that there IS stdacll in Linux. So... ?? Besides, for GCC I saw 2 implementations for that: __attribute__((__stdcall__)) and __attribute__((stdcall)) (without the underscores near stdcall). Which one is preferred (If applied to Linux at all)? Thanks! The simplest solution is to just define _