schematron

I have a problem with validating XML with schematron . In my code I load the XML and XSL as DOMDocument objects and I try to transform: $domSche = new DOMDocument(); $domSche->loadXML($message); $domXSLSche = new DOMDocument(); $domXSLSche->load("CI-SIS_StructurationCommuneCDAr2.xsl"); $xsltsche = new XSLTProcessor(); $xsltsche->importStylesheet($domXSLSche); $XSLValid = $xsltsche->transformToXml($domSche); But the function returns this error: XSLTProcessor::transformToXml(): No stylesheet associated to this object I don't understand, technically, the importStylesheet associates my XSL to the

I am running this code: string path = AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory; // Uri schemaUri = new Uri(@"file:\\" + path + @"\sch\patient.sch"); Uri totransformEE = new Uri(@"file:\\" + path + @"\po\po-schema.sch"); Uri transformER = new Uri(@"file:\\" + path + @"\xsl\conformance1-5.xsl"); /////////////////////////////// // Crate Schemtron xslt to be applied /////////////////////////////// // Create a Processor instance. Processor processor = new Processor(); // Load the source document XdmNode input = processor.NewDocumentBuilder().Build(totransformEE); // Create a transformer for the

As far as I can tell, JAXP by default supports W3C XML Schema and RelaxNG from Java 6 . I can see a few APIs, mostly experimental or incomplete, on the schematron.com links page . Is there an approach on validating schematron in Java that's complete, efficient and can be used with the JAXP API? Jing supports pre-ISO Schematron validation (note that Jing's implementation is based also on XSLT). There are also XSLT implementations that can be very easily invoked from Java. You need to decide what version of Schematron you are interested in and then get the corresponding stylesheet - all of them

Are there any command line-validators that can cope with relax ng-Schemas with embedded iso schematron? I've got a couple of relax ng-schemas with embedded iso-schematron rules which I have to be able to validate on the command line. As it seems, jing, our usual validator, only works with schematron 1.5. Surfing the web, I haven't been able to find any validator supporting embedded iso schematron but I use oXygen as an xml editor and I can validate just fine from there. Rintze Zelle You can use Jing, as long as you first extract the Schematron rules, and then run a separate validation against

I am trying to validate an XML file with Schematron, which is more complicated than XSD. I googled a lot and the best thing that came up is this Microsoft website . But that only shows how to validate with XSD with NMatrix.Schematron which is not what I need. I have the NMatrix.Schematron DLLs but I dont know how to use them. Does anyone know how to use it? I recommend that you instead use Rick Jelliffe's reference implementation of ISO Schematron using pure XSLT, preferably XSLT 2.0, with an established XSLT processor such as Michael Kay's Saxon . It would be better to use Saxon-HE from Nuget

I have created several Schematron assertations and they are all running fine against my XML instances. However, I would like to structure the output of my error messages in such a way, that I later can post-process them, with e.g., Java. The output of my assertion error message should be <error> <errorMessage>My error message</errorMessage> <violatingElement>The violating element</violatingElement> </error> However, a construct such as: <pattern> <rule context="/p1:Document/p1:Delivery/p1:DeliveryDetails/p1:ShippingDate"> <report test="."> <error> <errorMessage>My error message</errorMessage>

I've been looking around for at a way to make some more advanced business rule validation of XML documents. So far Schematron seems to be able to do, what I need. I've been looking around, and the few libraries I've found was very old and seemingly not supported any longer. Was Schematron only "hot" in 2002? Are there any libraries that can do the validation in C# - or how do I do it? Or are there others that can do the advanced validation and have C# libraries and are standardized? For what it's worth, this has been my experience... I've had moments where I wish schemas could do more along