ring

I copied some old code that was working in compojure 1.1.18 and other old libs, but using the latest versions I can't get it to work. Here's my minimal example code copied from the minimal example here to demonstrate that with latest ring and compojure libraries, I get an error when I send an http POST , even with the header set. lein ring server to start it, then do curl -X GET --cookie-jar cookies "http://localhost:3000/" which results in something like this: {"csrf-token":"7JnNbzx8BNG/kAeH4bz1jDdGc7zPC4TddDyiyPGX3jmpVilhyXJ7AOjfJgeQllGthFeVS/rgG4GpkUaF"} But when I do this curl -X POST -v -

在内核里操作进程 在内核里操作进程，相信是很多对 WINDOWS 内核编程感兴趣的朋友第一个学习的知识点。但在这里，我要让大家失望了，在内核里操作进程没什么特别的，就标准方法而言，还是调用那几个和进程相关的 NATIVE API 而已（当然了，本文所说的进程操作，还包括对线程和 DLL 模块的操作）。本文包括 10 个部分：分别是：枚举进程、暂停进程、恢复进程、结束进程、枚举线程、暂停线程、恢复线程、结束线程、枚举 DLL 模块、卸载 DLL 模块。 1.枚举进程。进程就是活动起来的程序。每一个进程在内核里，都有一个名为 EPROCESS 的巨大结构体记录它的详细信息，包括它的名字，编号（PID），出生地点（进程路径），老爹是谁（PPID 或父进程 ID）等。在 RING3 枚举进程，通常只要列出所有进程的编号即可。不过在 RING0 里，我们还要把它的身份证（EPROCESS）地址给列举出来。顺带说一句， 现实中男人最怕的事情 就是“ 喜当爹” ， 这种事情在内核里更加容易发生。因为 EPROCESS 里 有 且只有 一个 成员 是记录父进程 ID 的，稍微改一下，就可以认任意进程为爹了。枚举进程的方法很多，标准方法是使用 ZwQuerySystemInformation 的 SystemProcessInformation 功能号，不过如果在内核里也这么用的话

When I start up my current project with lein ring server and try to connect to it from Emacs via cider, I get the following warning: ; CIDER 0.8.2 (Java 1.7.0_51, Clojure 1.6.0, nREPL 0.2.6) WARNING: The following required nREPL ops are not supported: apropos classpath complete eldoc info inspect-start inspect-refresh inspect-pop inspect-push inspect-reset macroexpand ns-list ns-vars resource stacktrace toggle-trace-var toggle-trace-ns undef Please, install (or update) cider-nrepl 0.8.2 and restart CIDER user> However, I do have a dependency for [cider/cider-nrepl "0.8.2"] in my project.clj .

I have a ring+compojure application and I want to apply different middleware depending on whether the route is part of the web application or part of the api (which is json based). I found some answers to this question on stack overflow and other forums, but these answers seem more complicated than the solution I've been using. I wanted to know if there are drawbacks with how I'm doing it and what I may be missing in my solution. A very simplified version of what I'm doing is (defroutes app-routes (GET "/" [req] dump-req) (route/not-found "Not Found")) (defroutes api-routes (GET "/api" [req]

When I was calling the jetty handler directly, I was able to pass in a configurator like so: (def header-buffer-size 8388608) (defn start [port] (ring/run-jetty (var app) {:port port :join? false :host "127.0.0.1" :configurator (fn [jetty] (doseq [connector (.getConnectors jetty)] (.setHeaderBufferSize connector header-buffer-size)))})) I had to do this because I kept getting a FULL HEAD error when posting. Now I refactored things to use > lein ring server directly, which gets called from the command line. > lein ring server This uses some configuration specified in my project.clj: :ring {