resourcemanager | 易学教程

Objective-C: Use singleton vs. use class as an object?

阅读更多关于 Objective-C: Use singleton vs. use class as an object?

问题 I've been wondering in what cases it is really necessary to adopt the singleton pattern in objective-C (e.g., define a dedicated class and create a single instance), that using the class as an object won't do. Particularly, I'm thinking of the following solution: Define and use appropriate class methods, instead of instance methods on the singleton instance; Use static variables (file-scope globals), instead of instance variables of the singleton instance; Use the class object when

Why is it better to call the ResourceManager class as opposed to loading resources directly by name?

阅读更多关于 Why is it better to call the ResourceManager class as opposed to loading resources directly by name?

问题 I was working on localizing a large project, and I was doing that by creating a large resource file manually, and calling each string by name in the code. Instead of calling the ResourceManager and using GetString (for dialog boxes, etc), I was simply replacing each string by Resources.ClassName_MethodName_StringName . I have a feeling I'm supposed to be using the ResourceManager , but I want to understand why it's better before I change all of my code to use it. 回答1: Well, there's no reason

ResourceManager trying to load .resources not .resx file

阅读更多关于 ResourceManager trying to load .resources not .resx file

问题 I am trying to load a resx file in my .net website using: ResourceManager rm = new ResourceManager( "Project.Resource", Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly() ); The Resource.resx file is in the folder App_LocalResources and is set to be embedded in assembly on build. When I try to access the resx file using: rm.GetString( "key" ); or rm.GetString( "key", culture ); I get an error message: Could not find any resources appropriate for the specified culture or the neutral culture. Make sure "Project

Get all strings from resourcemanager

阅读更多关于 Get all strings from resourcemanager

I need to write a program, that reads all string resources from dll and insert them into some table. I have the method, that reads resources: private static IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<string,string>> getAllResources(ResourceManager resourceManager, Language language) { ResourceSet resourceSet = resourceManager.GetResourceSet(getCulture(language), true, true); IDictionaryEnumerator dictNumerator = resourceSet.GetEnumerator(); // Get all string resources while (dictNumerator.MoveNext()) { // Only string resources if (dictNumerator.Value is string) { var key = (string)dictNumerator.Key; var value =

Why is it better to call the ResourceManager class as opposed to loading resources directly by name?

阅读更多关于 Why is it better to call the ResourceManager class as opposed to loading resources directly by name?

I was working on localizing a large project, and I was doing that by creating a large resource file manually, and calling each string by name in the code. Instead of calling the ResourceManager and using GetString (for dialog boxes, etc), I was simply replacing each string by Resources.ClassName_MethodName_StringName . I have a feeling I'm supposed to be using the ResourceManager , but I want to understand why it's better before I change all of my code to use it. Well, there's no reason to use the ResourceManager directly (some exceptions to that will apply), because if you use generated code

Specifying custom resource file for an ASP.NET page/usercontrol

阅读更多关于 Specifying custom resource file for an ASP.NET page/usercontrol

If I have a page called Default.aspx, ASP.NET automatically uses the resource file named Default.aspx.resx in App_LocalResources for localizing server controls in the page. But for some reason, I need to choose another file, let's say Default-Custom.aspx.resx. To provide some background, I already have Default.aspx.resx but some users need to have different content shown to them, which I am going to put in Default-Custom.aspx.resx. Is is possible to choose the Resource file used for a TemplateControl in ASP.NET (short of writing a custom ResourceProvider)?? Take a look here: ResourceManager

ASP.Net and GetType()

阅读更多关于 ASP.Net and GetType()

I want to get a type of a "BasePage" object that I am creating. Every Page object is based off BasePage. For instance, I have a Login.aspx and in my code-behind and a class that has a method Display: Display(BasePage page) { ResourceManager manager = new ResourceManager(page.GetType()); } In my project structure I have a default resource file and a psuedo-translation resource file. If I set try something like this: Display(BasePage page) { ResourceManager manager = new ResourceManager(typeof(Login)); } it returns the translated page. After some research I found that page.GetType().ToString()

ASP.Net and GetType()

阅读更多关于 ASP.Net and GetType()

问题 I want to get a type of a "BasePage" object that I am creating. Every Page object is based off BasePage. For instance, I have a Login.aspx and in my code-behind and a class that has a method Display: Display(BasePage page) { ResourceManager manager = new ResourceManager(page.GetType()); } In my project structure I have a default resource file and a psuedo-translation resource file. If I set try something like this: Display(BasePage page) { ResourceManager manager = new ResourceManager(typeof

C++ shared_ptr vs. unique_ptr for resource management

阅读更多关于 C++ shared_ptr vs. unique_ptr for resource management

I've been mulling over use of unique_ptr vs shared_ptr vs own_solution . I've discounted the latter as I'll almost certainly get it wrong, but I have a problem with both unique_ptr and shared_ptr in that neither captures precisely what I want. I want to create a resource manager which explicitly owns a resource, however I'd like the resource manager to also hand out references to the resource. If I use unique_ptr in the resource manager and hand out raw pointers there's the possibility they could escape elsewhere (though this would be against the class "contract" I suppose). If I use shared

C++ shared_ptr vs. unique_ptr for resource management

阅读更多关于 C++ shared_ptr vs. unique_ptr for resource management

问题 I've been mulling over use of unique_ptr vs shared_ptr vs own_solution . I've discounted the latter as I'll almost certainly get it wrong, but I have a problem with both unique_ptr and shared_ptr in that neither captures precisely what I want. I want to create a resource manager which explicitly owns a resource, however I'd like the resource manager to also hand out references to the resource. If I use unique_ptr in the resource manager and hand out raw pointers there's the possibility they