python-asyncio

问题 I've written a simple HTTP client using aiohttp and I'm trying to test it by patching aiohttp.ClientSession and aiohttp.ClientResponse . However, it appears as though the unittest.mock.patch decorator is not respecting my asynchronous code. At a guess, I would say it's some kind of namespacing mismatch. Here's a minimal example: from aiohttp import ClientSession async def is_ok(url:str) -> bool: async with ClientSession() as session: async with session.request("GET", url) as response: return

问题 I've written a simple HTTP client using aiohttp and I'm trying to test it by patching aiohttp.ClientSession and aiohttp.ClientResponse . However, it appears as though the unittest.mock.patch decorator is not respecting my asynchronous code. At a guess, I would say it's some kind of namespacing mismatch. Here's a minimal example: from aiohttp import ClientSession async def is_ok(url:str) -> bool: async with ClientSession() as session: async with session.request("GET", url) as response: return

问题 I have this function which works fine locally on my machine with python 3.8, but it throws runtime error on Google Cloud Functions. def telegram_test(request): request_json = request.get_json() import datetime import pandas as pd from pyrogram import Client session_string = "...............38Q8uTHG5gHwyWD8nW6h................." # the rest of the authantication api_id = 32494131641215 api_hash = "ioadsfsjnjksfgnfriuthg#qw]/zwq ]w/\lc ec," # one of bbc channels on telegram you want to access

问题 I'm trying to create two threads that each have their own asyncio event loop. I've tried the following code but it doesn't seem to work: import asyncio from threading import Thread def hello(thread_name): print('hello from thread {}!'.format(thread_name)) event_loop_a = asyncio.new_event_loop() event_loop_b = asyncio.new_event_loop() def callback_a(): asyncio.set_event_loop(event_loop_a) asyncio.get_event_loop().call_soon_threadsafe(lambda: hello('a')) def callback_b(): asyncio.set_event_loop

问题 I'm trying to do something like this: import asyncio from itertools import islice async def generate_numbers(n): for x in range(n): yield x async def consume_numbers(n): async for x in generate_numbers(n): print(x) async def consume_some_numbers(n,m): async for x in islice(generate_numbers(n),m): #<-- This doesn't work. islice doesn't recognize async iterators as iterators. print(x) loop = asyncio.get_event_loop() loop.run_until_complete(consume_numbers(10)) loop.run_until_complete(consume

问题 Setup: Python 3.7.4 I am trying to create 6 sockets using asyncio listening on different ports. I tried to implement it like this. Code: import asyncio async def client_thread(reader, writer): while True: package_type = await reader.read(100) if not package_type: break if(package_type[0] == 1) : nn_output = get_some_bytes1 elif (package_type[0] == 2) : nn_output = get_some_bytes2 elif (package_type[0] == 3) : nn_output = get_some_bytes3 elif (package_type[0] == 4) : nn_output = get_some

问题 Setup: Python 3.7.4 I am trying to create 6 sockets using asyncio listening on different ports. I tried to implement it like this. Code: import asyncio async def client_thread(reader, writer): while True: package_type = await reader.read(100) if not package_type: break if(package_type[0] == 1) : nn_output = get_some_bytes1 elif (package_type[0] == 2) : nn_output = get_some_bytes2 elif (package_type[0] == 3) : nn_output = get_some_bytes3 elif (package_type[0] == 4) : nn_output = get_some

问题 As a followup to my previous question about calling an async function from a synchronous one, I've discovered asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe . On paper, this looks ideal. Based on the comments in this StackOverflow question, this looks ideal. I can create a new Thread, get a reference to my original event loop, and schedule the async function to run inside the original event loop while only blocking the new Thread. class _AsyncBridge: def call_async_method(self, function, *args, **kwargs):

问题 As a followup to my previous question about calling an async function from a synchronous one, I've discovered asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe . On paper, this looks ideal. Based on the comments in this StackOverflow question, this looks ideal. I can create a new Thread, get a reference to my original event loop, and schedule the async function to run inside the original event loop while only blocking the new Thread. class _AsyncBridge: def call_async_method(self, function, *args, **kwargs):

问题 As a followup to my previous question about calling an async function from a synchronous one, I've discovered asyncio.run_coroutine_threadsafe . On paper, this looks ideal. Based on the comments in this StackOverflow question, this looks ideal. I can create a new Thread, get a reference to my original event loop, and schedule the async function to run inside the original event loop while only blocking the new Thread. class _AsyncBridge: def call_async_method(self, function, *args, **kwargs):