pipe

Capture both stdout & stderr via pipe

可紊 提交于 2020-12-30 02:44:04
问题 I want to read both stderr and stdout from a child process, but it doesn't work. main.rs use std::process::{Command, Stdio}; use std::io::{BufRead, BufReader}; fn main() { let mut child = Command::new("./1.sh") .stdout(Stdio::piped()) .stderr(Stdio::piped()) .spawn() .unwrap(); let out = BufReader::new(child.stdout.take().unwrap()); let err = BufReader::new(child.stderr.take().unwrap()); out.lines().for_each(|line| println!("out: {}", line.unwrap()) ); err.lines().for_each(|line| println!(

Capture both stdout & stderr via pipe

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2020-12-30 02:43:29
问题 I want to read both stderr and stdout from a child process, but it doesn't work. main.rs use std::process::{Command, Stdio}; use std::io::{BufRead, BufReader}; fn main() { let mut child = Command::new("./1.sh") .stdout(Stdio::piped()) .stderr(Stdio::piped()) .spawn() .unwrap(); let out = BufReader::new(child.stdout.take().unwrap()); let err = BufReader::new(child.stderr.take().unwrap()); out.lines().for_each(|line| println!("out: {}", line.unwrap()) ); err.lines().for_each(|line| println!(

Why not pipe list of file names into cat?

回眸只為那壹抹淺笑 提交于 2020-12-29 09:45:42
问题 What is the design rationale that cat doesn't take list of file names from pipe input? Why did the designers choose that the following does not work? ls *.txt | cat Instead of this, they chose that we need to pass the file names as argument to cat as: ls *.txt | xargs cat 回答1: When you say ls *.txt | cat doesn't work, you should say that doesn't work as you expect. In fact, that works in the way it was thought to work. From man : cat - Concatenate FILE(s), or standard input, to standard

Why not pipe list of file names into cat?

混江龙づ霸主 提交于 2020-12-29 09:42:11
问题 What is the design rationale that cat doesn't take list of file names from pipe input? Why did the designers choose that the following does not work? ls *.txt | cat Instead of this, they chose that we need to pass the file names as argument to cat as: ls *.txt | xargs cat 回答1: When you say ls *.txt | cat doesn't work, you should say that doesn't work as you expect. In fact, that works in the way it was thought to work. From man : cat - Concatenate FILE(s), or standard input, to standard

Is there any difference between socketpair and pair of unnamed pipes?

删除回忆录丶 提交于 2020-11-30 02:57:31
问题 I would like to know not only user-side differences, but differences / common parts in Linux kernel implementation as well. 回答1: pipes are unidirectional, so you need two pipes to have bidirectional communication, whereas a socketpair is bidirectional. pipes are always stream-oriented, whereas socketpairs can be datagram-oriented. socketpairs are normal AF_UNIX sockets, which means that ancillary messages like SCM_RIGHTS and SCM_CREDENTIALS can be passed over them. In the kernel, pipes are

Is there any difference between socketpair and pair of unnamed pipes?

陌路散爱 提交于 2020-11-30 02:56:21
问题 I would like to know not only user-side differences, but differences / common parts in Linux kernel implementation as well. 回答1: pipes are unidirectional, so you need two pipes to have bidirectional communication, whereas a socketpair is bidirectional. pipes are always stream-oriented, whereas socketpairs can be datagram-oriented. socketpairs are normal AF_UNIX sockets, which means that ancillary messages like SCM_RIGHTS and SCM_CREDENTIALS can be passed over them. In the kernel, pipes are

Is there any difference between socketpair and pair of unnamed pipes?

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2020-11-30 02:54:46
问题 I would like to know not only user-side differences, but differences / common parts in Linux kernel implementation as well. 回答1: pipes are unidirectional, so you need two pipes to have bidirectional communication, whereas a socketpair is bidirectional. pipes are always stream-oriented, whereas socketpairs can be datagram-oriented. socketpairs are normal AF_UNIX sockets, which means that ancillary messages like SCM_RIGHTS and SCM_CREDENTIALS can be passed over them. In the kernel, pipes are

Simulate the Linux command tee in C

浪尽此生 提交于 2020-11-29 10:13:38
问题 I have to do the simulation of the command tee in C for Linux. How does tee work internally? It looks like a T-shaped pipe, so should I use a pipe? Is there a special kind of pipe? 回答1: tee takes stdin and copies the data stream to stdout as well as a file given as an option, it can be used in many very different situations. An implementation in C is quite simple, just make a program that copies all data from stdin to stdout, but also use the same output statements for stdout on a file that

Simulate the Linux command tee in C

戏子无情 提交于 2020-11-29 10:13:30
问题 I have to do the simulation of the command tee in C for Linux. How does tee work internally? It looks like a T-shaped pipe, so should I use a pipe? Is there a special kind of pipe? 回答1: tee takes stdin and copies the data stream to stdout as well as a file given as an option, it can be used in many very different situations. An implementation in C is quite simple, just make a program that copies all data from stdin to stdout, but also use the same output statements for stdout on a file that

Simulate the Linux command tee in C

末鹿安然 提交于 2020-11-29 10:11:38
问题 I have to do the simulation of the command tee in C for Linux. How does tee work internally? It looks like a T-shaped pipe, so should I use a pipe? Is there a special kind of pipe? 回答1: tee takes stdin and copies the data stream to stdout as well as a file given as an option, it can be used in many very different situations. An implementation in C is quite simple, just make a program that copies all data from stdin to stdout, but also use the same output statements for stdout on a file that