orphaned-objects

Setting orphanRemoval to true while migrating children from their parent to another parent

江枫思渺然 提交于 2019-12-17 20:37:17
问题 Important Notice : If you are reading this post, then consider looking into this post too for in-depth discussions. It is a quite usual practice/situation/requirement where children of a parent may be migrated to another parent. What happens, if orphanRemoval is set to true on the inverse side of such relationships? Consider as an example, any simple one-to-many relationship as follows. Inverse side (Department) : @OneToMany(mappedBy = "department", fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade =

Auto-expire orphaned Subscription (Azure ServiceBus Messaging SubscriptionClient)

Deadly 提交于 2019-12-01 03:54:50
The scenario I have in mind is this: Service Bus is used for instance-to-instance communication, so a Subscription is unique per service instance. The end result is that if an instance does not shut down gracefully, its subscription does not get deleted. When a service instance "dies" and restarts, previous contents of the subscription are irrelevant and can be discarded. So, is there a way to set a "time to live" for Service Bus Subscription or simulate something similar, without having to resort to some custom orphan detection mechanism? that exact feature is on the backlog for one of the

Auto-expire orphaned Subscription (Azure ServiceBus Messaging SubscriptionClient)

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-11-30 23:54:25
问题 The scenario I have in mind is this: Service Bus is used for instance-to-instance communication, so a Subscription is unique per service instance. The end result is that if an instance does not shut down gracefully, its subscription does not get deleted. When a service instance "dies" and restarts, previous contents of the subscription are irrelevant and can be discarded. So, is there a way to set a "time to live" for Service Bus Subscription or simulate something similar, without having to

Efficiently delete orphaned m2m objects/tags in Django

妖精的绣舞 提交于 2019-11-30 15:13:35
I have two models - Photo and Tag - which are connected via a ManyToManyField. class Photo(models.Model): tags = models.ManyToManyField(Tag) class Tag(models.Model): lang = models.CharField(max_length=2) name_es = models.CharField(max_length=40) name_en = models.CharField(max_length=40) Every once in a while, we get orphaned tags, that are not referenced any more by any photo. Is there an efficient way of deleting those tags? I know about this answer: Django: delete M2M orphan entries? And our solution looks like this at the moment: for tag in Tag.objects.all(): if not tag.photo_set.select

Efficiently delete orphaned m2m objects/tags in Django

十年热恋 提交于 2019-11-29 21:45:22
问题 I have two models - Photo and Tag - which are connected via a ManyToManyField. class Photo(models.Model): tags = models.ManyToManyField(Tag) class Tag(models.Model): lang = models.CharField(max_length=2) name_es = models.CharField(max_length=40) name_en = models.CharField(max_length=40) Every once in a while, we get orphaned tags, that are not referenced any more by any photo. Is there an efficient way of deleting those tags? I know about this answer: Django: delete M2M orphan entries? And

Prevent Hibernate from deleting orphaned entities while merging an entity having entity associations with orphanRemoval set to true

旧巷老猫 提交于 2019-11-29 09:07:29
Taking a very simple example of one-to-many relationship (country -> state). Country (inverse side) : @OneToMany(mappedBy = "country", fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true) private List<StateTable> stateTableList=new ArrayList<StateTable>(0); StateTable (owning side) : @JoinColumn(name = "country_id", referencedColumnName = "country_id") @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType.DETACH}) private Country country; The method attempting to update a supplied (detached) StateTable entity

Setting orphanRemoval to true while migrating children from their parent to another parent

人盡茶涼 提交于 2019-11-28 12:21:33
Important Notice : If you are reading this post, then consider looking into this post too for in-depth discussions. It is a quite usual practice/situation/requirement where children of a parent may be migrated to another parent. What happens, if orphanRemoval is set to true on the inverse side of such relationships? Consider as an example, any simple one-to-many relationship as follows. Inverse side (Department) : @OneToMany(mappedBy = "department", fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true) private List<Employee> employeeList = new ArrayList<Employee>(0); Owning

Prevent Hibernate from deleting orphaned entities while merging an entity having entity associations with orphanRemoval set to true

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2019-11-28 02:30:52
问题 Taking a very simple example of one-to-many relationship (country -> state). Country (inverse side) : @OneToMany(mappedBy = "country", fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = CascadeType.ALL, orphanRemoval = true) private List<StateTable> stateTableList=new ArrayList<StateTable>(0); StateTable (owning side) : @JoinColumn(name = "country_id", referencedColumnName = "country_id") @ManyToOne(fetch = FetchType.LAZY, cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.MERGE, CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType