obscured-view | 易学教程

Hide links from Google via JavaScript

阅读更多关于 Hide links from Google via JavaScript

问题 We have some links we want to hide from Google, using Javascript to "hide" the link but let it work for the real clients. I was told from the SEO agency that the best method is to base64 encode the link and call it via javascript: <a data-href="RdcDovL1N0YWdpbmc...base64...hhcmRpbmctaGVycmVuLWhlbaQtMTgyMDg3" href="#">Link</a> <script> <!-- var _dlist = document.getElementsByTagName('A'); for(i=0;i<_dlist.length;i++) { var _data = _dlist[i].getAttribute( 'data-href' ); if( _data !== 'null' ) {

Hide links from Google via JavaScript

阅读更多关于 Hide links from Google via JavaScript

ClearCase: Files in 2 branches obscure each other

阅读更多关于 ClearCase: Files in 2 branches obscure each other

问题 I have checked in the same file (filename) twice in 2 different branches (say, development and release). This breaks just about anything, so I want to take 1 version and "properly" copy/merge it to the other branch, later merging in the lost changes manually (from a backup). Then I would lose history for 1 file but at least the 2 files would be connected again. How to do it? Also note, since the connection is broken, I cannot mere, also, when doing a Version Tree, both files have different

Analogue of android:filterTouchesWhenObscured for API level below 9

阅读更多关于 Analogue of android:filterTouchesWhenObscured for API level below 9

问题 Starting with API level 9, there's android:filterTouchesWhenObscured attribute and corresponding setFilterTouchesWhenObscured method on ViewGroup . For example, when a view has onClickListener set and another view obscures that view (e.g. an overlay panel, a toast, or anything else), then touches will not be passed to the obscured view - in my example, onClick will not be fired. However, this is not available in API level 7 - and for my project the requirement is Android 2.1 and above, which

ClearCase: Files in 2 branches obscure each other

阅读更多关于 ClearCase: Files in 2 branches obscure each other

I have checked in the same file (filename) twice in 2 different branches (say, development and release). This breaks just about anything, so I want to take 1 version and "properly" copy/merge it to the other branch, later merging in the lost changes manually (from a backup). Then I would lose history for 1 file but at least the 2 files would be connected again. How to do it? Also note, since the connection is broken, I cannot mere, also, when doing a Version Tree, both files have different version trees. (It is not 2 views at different files in 1 Version Tree, like is the normal/correct case.)