modularization | 易学教程

How can we share individual rules between .drl files in JBoss Rules?

阅读更多关于 How can we share individual rules between .drl files in JBoss Rules?

问题 We are using JBoss Rules (a.k.a. Drools) and have several .drl files that each contain several rules. Is there a way to avoid duplication between files, so that we can define common rules that are available to more than one .drl file? Unfortunately, there does not seem to be any kind of include or module facility. 回答1: There is no way of including rules from another .drl file from within a .drl file. You can however add two .drl files to the same ruleBase and they will work as if they were in

How to use FS when MODULARIZE and EXPORT_NAME are used in emscripten

阅读更多关于 How to use FS when MODULARIZE and EXPORT_NAME are used in emscripten

问题 I have an application that contains libraries generated with emscripten. I am compiling them using the flags: -s MODULARIZE=1 -s EXPORT_NAME=\"'SomeModuleName'\" However, the library FS is no longer available. When I was compiling without the flags, I could use the library FS in any other script. Is it possible to export FS in my module? 回答1: The FS module is not exported by default when using the flag -s EXPORT_NAME="'SomeModuleName'" If you want to export the module FS, you have to add the

angular.js - best practice for defining a utility library

阅读更多关于 angular.js - best practice for defining a utility library

问题 I'm giving my first steps with angular, and I need to define a utility helper library, with a couple of function methods, something like dataHelper.parse , dataHelper.sanitize , etc What would be the recommended way to organize it in angular? 回答1: For utility methods, I would organize them in a library outside of the Angular framework, but with a small dependency on angular.extend. If you want your library completely independent of Angular, you can substitute extend with your own

How split packages are avoided in Java 9

阅读更多关于 How split packages are avoided in Java 9

问题 I am new to Java 9 and was going though the modular video lectures by Java on YouTube. They mentioned 3 benefits of modularization- 1. No missing dependencies 2. No cyclic dependnpcies 3. No split packages. As far as I understand about split packages is that let's say an application is dependant on multiple dependncies and let's say package abc.pqr.xyz is present in more that 1 jar. Then there is a chance that some of the classes in that package will be used from jar1 while other classes from

How split packages are avoided in Java 9

阅读更多关于 How split packages are avoided in Java 9

I am new to Java 9 and was going though the modular video lectures by Java on YouTube. They mentioned 3 benefits of modularization- 1. No missing dependencies 2. No cyclic dependnpcies 3. No split packages. As far as I understand about split packages is that let's say an application is dependant on multiple dependncies and let's say package abc.pqr.xyz is present in more that 1 jar. Then there is a chance that some of the classes in that package will be used from jar1 while other classes from jar2. This might lead to some problems at runtime which will be hard to debug. Video says

angular.js - best practice for defining a utility library

阅读更多关于 angular.js - best practice for defining a utility library

I'm giving my first steps with angular, and I need to define a utility helper library, with a couple of function methods, something like dataHelper.parse , dataHelper.sanitize , etc What would be the recommended way to organize it in angular? For utility methods, I would organize them in a library outside of the Angular framework, but with a small dependency on angular.extend. If you want your library completely independent of Angular, you can substitute extend with your own implementation. Wrap your utility API in a JavaScript enclosure and expose your library as a property of window (in the

How to modularize a JSF/Facelets/Spring application with OSGi?

阅读更多关于 How to modularize a JSF/Facelets/Spring application with OSGi?

I'm working with very large JSF/Facelets applications which use Spring for DI/bean management. My applications have modular structure and I'm currently looking for approaches to standardize the modularization. My goal is to compose a web application from a number of modules (possibly depending on each other). Each module may contain the following: Classes; Static resources (images, CSS, scripts); Facelet templates; Managed beans - Spring application contexts, with request, session and application-scoped beans (alternative is JSF managed beans); Servlet API stuff - servlets, filters, listeners

C++ modularization framework (like OSGi) ?

阅读更多关于 C++ modularization framework (like OSGi) ?

问题 I found one SOF http://www.codeproject.com/KB/library/SOF_.aspx , Are there anyother stable frameworks for modularization in C++ ? 回答1: The OSGi4Cpp tries to implement the OSGi specification in C++. 回答2: The authors of the open source Portable Components library (POCO) have also developed a modular framework based on OSGI called OSP or Open Service Platform. http://www.appinf.com/en/products/osp.html. It's not open source however. 回答3: I found this write-up which gives a status as of April

How to modularize a JSF/Facelets/Spring application with OSGi?

阅读更多关于 How to modularize a JSF/Facelets/Spring application with OSGi?

问题 I'm working with very large JSF/Facelets applications which use Spring for DI/bean management. My applications have modular structure and I'm currently looking for approaches to standardize the modularization. My goal is to compose a web application from a number of modules (possibly depending on each other). Each module may contain the following: Classes; Static resources (images, CSS, scripts); Facelet templates; Managed beans - Spring application contexts, with request, session and