microformats

How do I set the license for images on my site in Google Images?

无人久伴 提交于 2019-12-04 09:49:13
Google Images has an option to filter images based on license. Each image on my site has a details page, where I have the following link to denote the license: <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_US" target="_blank">CC-BY</a> It's a modified version of the sample code from Creative Commons - Choose a License . However, I see images that Google has indexed since I added this code do not appear when I select a license filter. You need to wrap it around a div with an about attribute. Here's an example that Google provides: <div about="image.jpg"> <img src=

How can I convert datetime microformat to local time in javascript?

橙三吉。 提交于 2019-12-04 02:15:33
问题 I have a page that is currently using the datetime microformat to display a timestamp, but I have only been showing the human-readable time for my own time zone: <abbr class="published" title="2009-01-09T09:16:00-05:00"> Friday, January 9, 2009 at 9:16 am (EST)</abbr> What I'd like to do is rewrite the innerHTML for the abbr tag to be the same format, but in the user's local timezone. So for a reader in Seattle, the above should be converted to: <abbr class="published" title="2009-01-09T09:16

What is the relationship between RDF, RDFa, Microformats and Microdata

巧了我就是萌 提交于 2019-12-03 04:52:33
问题 I've done quite a bit of research but I can't understand the exact relationship between the 3. Also, now that W3C has officially recognised RDFa, would you recommend it over Microdata, taking into consideration that it matches Microdata's features and more? 回答1: <sarcasm>I can't imagine what you find so confusing</sarcasm> (edit: these tags were invisible before) Very briefly: Microformats A way to use html pages as both a human readable document and machine readable data , without repetition

What is the relationship between RDF, RDFa, Microformats and Microdata

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-12-02 18:08:42
I've done quite a bit of research but I can't understand the exact relationship between the 3. Also, now that W3C has officially recognised RDFa, would you recommend it over Microdata, taking into consideration that it matches Microdata's features and more? <sarcasm>I can't imagine what you find so confusing</sarcasm> (edit: these tags were invisible before) Very briefly: Microformats A way to use html pages as both a human readable document and machine readable data , without repetition (e.g. sticking CSV in the head element). RDF A data model designed for the web. Schemaless, uses URLs to

microformats, rdf or microdata

眉间皱痕 提交于 2019-11-29 19:50:52
Is there any difference between using one of this technologies? I'm building now a site using HTML5, and I'm having hard time to decide which one of them to use. I cannot see any difference between them, else the syntax size, which I'm not quite sure is an advantage for the microformats side. cygri *Edit, May 2015: Times have changed... again . Schema.org seems the way to go, using either microdata (W3C note) or RDFa (W3C recommendation), where the RDFa Lite variant is easiest to learn. Meanwhile recently Microformats released a new version as well, which nobody is paying attention to

What rel=profile is for?

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-11-28 19:07:12
While doing the HTML for my new template, I stumbled across a new meta tag <link rel="profile" href="http://gmpg.org/xfn/11" /> What's this for? I found it linking to this page , and through Google I found this Microformat but I didn't get it. unor In HTML 4.01, there is the profile attribute for the head element: This attribute specifies the location of one or more meta data profiles, separated by white space. For future extensions, user agents should consider the value to be a list even though this specification only considers the first URI to be significant. It is used to link to meta data

microformats, rdf or microdata

喜你入骨 提交于 2019-11-28 15:39:24
问题 Is there any difference between using one of this technologies? I'm building now a site using HTML5, and I'm having hard time to decide which one of them to use. I cannot see any difference between them, else the syntax size, which I'm not quite sure is an advantage for the microformats side. 回答1: *Edit, May 2015: Times have changed... again . Schema.org seems the way to go, using either microdata (W3C note) or RDFa (W3C recommendation), where the RDFa Lite variant is easiest to learn.

Statistics about “Microformat vs HTML+RDFa” adoption

*爱你&永不变心* 提交于 2019-11-27 15:14:13
问题 Are there some recent and reliable statistics about "Web use" (webpages using one standard or another) of these standards? Or an specific statistic about vCard (person and/or organization) scope of use? Only statistics , this question is not about "what the best ideia?" or "how to use it?". Looking for statistics numbers to compare Microformats adoption with (any kind of) RDFa in HTML adoption. We can considere, for "counting pages" statistics, that Microdata is a kind of RDFa-HTML. NOTES

Disabling browser tooltips on links and <abbr>s

一笑奈何 提交于 2019-11-27 01:38:16
I want to suppress the web browser's default tooltip display when a user hovers over certain links and elements. I know it's possible but I don't know how. Can anyone help? The reason for this is to suppress the tooltip for microformatted date-times. The BBC dropped support for hCalendar because the appearane of the machine-readable date was an accessibility issue for those with cognitive disabilities aswell as some screen reader users. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/07/why_the_bbc_removed_microforma.html EDIT: I whipped up a jquery plugin along the same lines as Aron's suggestion

Disabling browser tooltips on links and <abbr>s

元气小坏坏 提交于 2019-11-26 09:44:32
问题 I want to suppress the web browser\'s default tooltip display when a user hovers over certain links and elements. I know it\'s possible but I don\'t know how. Can anyone help? The reason for this is to suppress the tooltip for microformatted date-times. The BBC dropped support for hCalendar because the appearane of the machine-readable date was an accessibility issue for those with cognitive disabilities aswell as some screen reader users. http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/07/why