members

To use getAttribute(), or not to use getAttribute(): that is the question [duplicate]

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2019-11-30 13:45:47
Possible Duplicate: JavaScript setAttribute vs .attribute= javascript dom, how to handle "special properties" as versus attributes? Many times, in forums or places such as Usenet I have been told by some (when criticizing my code) that instead of saying, for example var link = a.href I should use var link = a.getAttribute('href'); instead. And use its complementary setAttribute() when wanting to assign. They say it is the correct way to do it, that I am wrong, blah blah blah... I don’t normally pay any attention to those. And when I ask why nobody gives a real answer. Now I am curious about in

Javascript new object (function ) vs inline invocation

 ̄綄美尐妖づ 提交于 2019-11-30 07:25:33
Is there any considerations to determine which is better practice for creating an object with private members? var object = new function () { var private = "private variable"; return { method : function () { ..dosomething with private; } } } VS var object = function () { ... }(); Basically what is the difference between using NEW here, and just invoking the function immediately after we define it? The new operator causes the function to be invoked like a Constructor Function . I've seen that pattern before, but I don't see any benefits of using it. The purpose of the new operator is to create

Why do I get “warning: missing initializer for member”? [-Wmissing-field-initializers]

我们两清 提交于 2019-11-30 05:19:00
问题 I'm wondering why I am getting an warning about initialization in one case, but not the other. The code is in a C++ source file, and using GCC 4.7 with -std=c++11 . struct sigaction old_handler, new_handler; The above produces NO warnings with -Wall and -Wextra . struct sigaction old_handler={}, new_handler={}; struct sigaction old_handler={0}, new_handler={0}; The above produces warnings: warning: missing initializer for member ‘sigaction::__sigaction_handler’ [-Wmissing-field-initializers]

Do Sub-Classes Really Inherit Private Member Variables?

穿精又带淫゛_ 提交于 2019-11-28 04:46:59
Basically as far as I know, when you create a base class with a public, protected, and private section and variables/functions in each the public and protected sections will get inherited into the appropriate section of the sub-class (defined by class subclass : private base, which will take all public and protected members of base and put them into public, changing the word private to public puts them all in public and changing it to protected puts them all into protected). So, when you create a sub-class you never receive anything from the private section of the previous class (the base

Do Sub-Classes Really Inherit Private Member Variables?

笑着哭i 提交于 2019-11-27 00:24:23
问题 Basically as far as I know, when you create a base class with a public, protected, and private section and variables/functions in each the public and protected sections will get inherited into the appropriate section of the sub-class (defined by class subclass : private base, which will take all public and protected members of base and put them into public, changing the word private to public puts them all in public and changing it to protected puts them all into protected). So, when you

Unresolved external symbol on static class members

懵懂的女人 提交于 2019-11-25 22:47:34
问题 Very simply put: I have a class that consists mostly of static public members, so I can group similar functions together that still have to be called from other classes/functions. Anyway, I have defined two static unsigned char variables in my class public scope, when I try to modify these values in the same class\' constructor, I am getting an \"unresolved external symbol\" error at compilation. class test { public: static unsigned char X; static unsigned char Y; ... test(); }; test::test()