java-11

javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No available authentication scheme

喜你入骨 提交于 2020-12-12 06:29:47
问题 A google reveals a bug in jdk11.0.2 but I upgraded to jdk11.0.3 and this still exists for me. Steps to reproduce git clone https://github.com/deanhiller/webpieces.git add the line "org.gradle.java.home=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.0.3.jdk/Contents/Home" to ~/.gradle/gradle.properties to set jdk to 11.0.3 run ./gradlew :core:core-asyncserver:test from webpieces directory The test case hangs and in the logs, it shows Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: No available

Proxy Authentication with JDK 11 HttpClient

本小妞迷上赌 提交于 2020-12-08 07:23:42
问题 I'm trying to use JDK 11 HttpClient to make requests through a corporate proxy which requires authentication by login and password. According to JDK's intro, I'm building an instance of client by means of: HttpClient httpClient = HttpClient.newBuilder() .version(HTTP_1_1) .proxy(ProxySelector.of(new InetSocketAddress("proxy.mycompany.com", 3128))) .authenticator(authenticator) .build(); , where authenticator is: Authenticator authenticator = new Authenticator() { @Override protected

Compiled code in java 8 vs Compiled code in java 11

送分小仙女□ 提交于 2020-12-06 04:33:38
问题 We currently have code compiled in Java 8 but we are running that on Java 11 VM. Now we are trying to move our code to Java 11 compile time as well. Wondering if there are any benefits to compiled code in Java 8 vs Compiled code in Java 11 performance-wise, since both compilers will produce different class files (bytecode)? How does one differ from the other in terms of efficiency? 回答1: javac is not an optimizing compiler, so in general, don't expect it to produce "faster" bytecode from

Compiled code in java 8 vs Compiled code in java 11

北城余情 提交于 2020-12-06 04:33:29
问题 We currently have code compiled in Java 8 but we are running that on Java 11 VM. Now we are trying to move our code to Java 11 compile time as well. Wondering if there are any benefits to compiled code in Java 8 vs Compiled code in Java 11 performance-wise, since both compilers will produce different class files (bytecode)? How does one differ from the other in terms of efficiency? 回答1: javac is not an optimizing compiler, so in general, don't expect it to produce "faster" bytecode from

Java 11 on latest Mac OS seems to lock the file system for minutes at a time

老子叫甜甜 提交于 2020-12-05 07:06:39
问题 This bounty has ended . Answers to this question are eligible for a +50 reputation bounty. Bounty grace period ends in 14 hours . Randgalt wants to draw more attention to this question: This is killing me - anyone else get this? Any ideas for debugging and/or solving the problem? Since upgrading to java 11 on my Macbook Pro (latest OS, etc.) compiling projects seems to often lock the entire file system for long periods of time. Anyone else having this problem? Any ideas how to debug it?

Log4j2/Slf4j and Java 11

孤人 提交于 2020-12-05 07:01:42
问题 I'm currently trying to build an app with log4j/slf4j and java 11 but I'm facing this problem at runtime: 2018-12-10 22:09:27,225 main INFO Cannot initialize scripting support because this JRE does not support it. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/script/ScriptEngineManager at org.apache.logging.log4j.core@2.11.1/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.script.ScriptManager.<init>(ScriptManager.java:69) at org.apache.logging.log4j.core@2.11.1/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config

Log4j2/Slf4j and Java 11

自作多情 提交于 2020-12-05 06:59:22
问题 I'm currently trying to build an app with log4j/slf4j and java 11 but I'm facing this problem at runtime: 2018-12-10 22:09:27,225 main INFO Cannot initialize scripting support because this JRE does not support it. java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/script/ScriptEngineManager at org.apache.logging.log4j.core@2.11.1/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.script.ScriptManager.<init>(ScriptManager.java:69) at org.apache.logging.log4j.core@2.11.1/org.apache.logging.log4j.core.config