interrupted-exception

My epoll_wait fails due to EINTR. My gdb trace shows this: enter code here 221 in ../nptl/sysdeps/pthread/createthread.c (gdb) 224 in ../nptl/sysdeps/pthread/createthread.c (gdb) [New Thread 0x40988490 (LWP 3589)] 227 in ../nptl/sysdeps/pthread/createthread.c (gdb) epoll_wait error in start timer: Measurement will befor entire duration of execution epoll_wait: Interrupted system call [Thread 0x40988490 (LWP 3589) exited] This string "epoll_wait error in start timer: Measurement will befor entire duration of execution" is printed by me in stderr. I am not able to make out, how to remedy this

Given a thread which was interrupted while it was not blocked (i.e. no InterruptedException was thrown), does that thread throw an InterruptedException when it later attempts to sleep? The documentation does not state this clearly: InterruptedException - if any thread has interrupted the current thread. The interrupted status of the current thread is cleared when this exception is thrown. Yes, it does. The documentation perhaps isn't crystal clear on that point, but this is easy to both test (see the your own answer below, for example), and to see the canonical (HotSpot) implementation. Thread

As the Intel Manual illustrated, both Interrupt Gate and Trap Gate can be used to access a handler routine. And some exceptions even share vector numbers with interrupts. I am wondering when such a shared vector is detected by the CPU, how could CPU know whether it stands for an exception or an interrupt? I am kind of confused about the logic among the following things: the decision of the gate types in the IDT the judgement of whether the vector stands for an exception or an interrupt Which decides which? I hope I made myself clear... Update 1 Thanks for nos' reply. Do you mean I have to tell

In the below code snipped when dispose() is called, then the emitter thread is interrupted ( InterruptedException is thrown out of sleep method). Observable<Integer> obs = Observable.create(emitter -> { for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { if (emitter.isDisposed()) { System.out.println("> exiting."); emitter.onComplete(); return; } emitter.onNext(i); System.out.println("> calculation = " + i); try { Thread.sleep(1000); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } emitter.onComplete(); }); Disposable disposable = obs .subscribeOn(Schedulers.computation()) .subscribe(System.out::println

Let us suppose that I have a thread that consumes items produced by another thread. Its run method is as follows, with inQueue being a BlockingQueue boolean shutdown = false; while (!shutdown) { try { WorkItem w = inQueue.take(); w.consume(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { shutdown = true; } } Furthermore, a different thread will signal that there are no more work items by interrupting this running thread. Will take() throw an interrupted exception if it does not need to block to retrieve the next work item. i.e. if the producer signals that it is done filling the work queue, is it

I've come across the code below, and I'm wondering if it does exactly what I think it does: synchronized(sObject) { mShouldExit = true; sObject.notifyAll() while (!mExited) { try { sObject.wait(); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { Thread.currentThread().interrupt(); } } } About the context: there is another thread that checks for mShouldExit (inside the sObject monitor) and will exit in that case. This does not look to be a correct pattern to me. If an interrupt happens, it will set the interrupted status again, so when it returns to sObject.wait() , another InterruptedException will come

I have this piece of code. A LinkedBlockingQueue should only throw an Exception if interrupted while waiting to add to the queue. But this queue is unbounded so it should add asap. Why does my shutdown methode throw an InterruptedException ? private final LinkedBlockingQueue<Message> messages= new LinkedBlockingQueue<Message>(); public void run(){ LinkedList<Message> messages = new LinkedList<Message>(); while (true){ try{ messages.clear(); messages.add(this.messages.take()); this.messages.drainTo(messages); for (Message message:messages){ if(message.isPoison())return; doSomething(message); }

I have an error at line 42 and 43 : Thread t1=new Thread(()->prod.test()); , Thread t2=new Thread(()->cons.test()); Unhandled exception type InterruptedException . If I try to quickfix it will created the try catch with an catch Exception , it will have the same error and will try to fix it in the same way continuing to surround it with try catch. import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock; import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock; interface Predicate { public void test() throws InterruptedException; } class MyClass { int num = 0; Lock lock = new ReentrantLock(); public void produce()